1.
Developing Core Outcome Measurement Sets for Clinical Trials: OMERACT Filter 2.0
by Boers, Maarten
Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2014, Vol.67 (7), p.745-753
2.
Measure once, cut twice—adding patient-reported outcome measures to the electronic health record for comparative effectiveness research
by Wu, Albert W
Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2013, Vol.66 (8), p.S12-S20
3.
What are the best outcome measurements for atopic eczema? A systematic review
by Schmitt, Jochen, MD, MPH
Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 2007, Vol.120 (6), p.1389-1398
4.
High quality of the evidence for medical and other health-related interventions was uncommon in Cochrane systematic reviews
by Fleming, Padhraig S
Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2016, Vol.78, p.34-42
5.
Outcomes in systematic reviews of complex interventions never reached “high” GRADE ratings when compared with those of simple interventions
by Movsisyan, Ani
Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2016, Vol.78, p.22-33
6.
Design analysis indicates Potential overestimation of treatment effects in randomized controlled trials supporting Food and Drug Administration cancer drug approvals
by Lord, Emily M
Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2018, Vol.103, p.1-9
7.
Assessing and demonstrating data saturation in qualitative inquiry supporting patient-reported outcomes research
by Kerr, Cicely
Expert review of pharmacoeconomics & outcomes research, 2010, Vol.10 (3), p.269-281
8.
Establishing objective volume-outcome measures for anterior and posterior cervical spine fusion
by Blais, Micah B
Clinical neurology and neurosurgery, 2017, Vol.161, p.65-69
9.
Inaccuracy of the administrative database: comparative analysis of two databases for the diagnosis and treatment of intracranial aneurysms
by Woodworth, Graeme F
Neurosurgery, 2009, Vol.65 (2), p.251-257
10.
Ovarian cancer screening and mortality in the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS): a randomised controlled trial
by Jacobs, Ian J, Prof
The Lancet (British edition), 2015, Vol.387 (10022), p.945-956
11.
The Swedish Spine Register: development, design and utility
by Strömqvist, Björn
European spine journal, 2009, Vol.18 (Suppl 3), p.294-304
12.
A taxonomy has been developed for outcomes in medical research to help improve knowledge discovery
by Dodd, Susanna
Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2018, Vol.96, p.84-92
13.
The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes
by Mokkink, Lidwine B
Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2010, Vol.63 (7), p.737-745
14.
GRADE guidelines: 22. The GRADE approach for tests and strategies—from test accuracy to patient-important outcomes and recommendations
by Schünemann, Holger J
Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2019, Vol.111, p.69-82
15.
Representativeness of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Internet panel
by Liu, Honghu
Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2010, Vol.63 (11), p.1169-1178
16.
Effect of early intensive multifactorial therapy on 5-year cardiovascular outcomes in individuals with type 2 diabetes detected by screening (ADDITION-Europe): a cluster-randomised...
by Griffin, Simon J, Dr
The Lancet (British edition), 2011, Vol.378 (9786), p.156-167
17.
Defining a Minimum Set of Standardized Patient-centered Outcome Measures for Macular Degeneration
by Rodrigues, Ian A., MBBS, BSc, FRCOphth
American journal of ophthalmology, 2015, Vol.168, p.1-12
18.
Defining Treatment Response in Pediatric Tic Disorders: A Signal Detection Analysis of the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale
by Storch, Eric A.
Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology, 2011, Vol.21 (6), p.621-627
19.
When to use agreement versus reliability measures
by de Vet, Henrica C.W
Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2006, Vol.59 (10), p.1033-1039
20.
Mind the MIC: large variation among populations and methods
by Terwee, Caroline B
Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2010, Vol.63 (5), p.524-534
