1.
Searching for qualitative health research required several databases and alternative search strategies: a study of coverage in bibliographic databases
by Frandsen, Tove Faber
Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2019, Vol.114, p.118-124
2.
Testing the reliability and efficiency of the pilot Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) for systematic mixed studies review
by Pace, Romina
International journal of nursing studies, 2012, Vol.49 (1), p.47-53
3.
Living systematic review: 1. Introduction—the why, what, when, and how
by Elliott, Julian H
Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2017, Vol.91, p.23-30
4.
Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance series—paper 5: methods for integrating qualitative and implementation evidence within intervention effectiveness rev...
by Harden, Angela
Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2018, Vol.97, p.70-78
5.
Recommendations for assessing the risk of bias in systematic reviews of health-care interventions
by Viswanathan, Meera
Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2018, Vol.97, p.26-34
6.
The WHO-5 Well-Being Index: A Systematic Review of the Literature
by Topp, Christian Winther
Psychotherapy and psychosomatics, 2015, Vol.84 (3), p.167-176
7.
Association between prospective registration and overall reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological study
by Ge, Long
Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2018, Vol.93, p.45-55
8.
Rapid reviews may produce different results to systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological study
by Marshall, Iain J
Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2019, Vol.109, p.30-41
9.
Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance series—paper 2: methods for question formulation, searching, and protocol development for qualitative evidence synthe...
by Harris, Janet L
Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2018, Vol.97, p.39-48
10.
Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance series—paper 3: methods for assessing methodological limitations, data extraction and synthesis, and confidence in sy...
by Noyes, Jane
Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2018, Vol.97, p.49-58
11.
Barriers and enablers to adolescent self-consent for vaccination: A mixed-methods evidence synthesis
by Fisher, Harriet
Vaccine, 2019, Vol.37 (3), p.417-429
12.
Quality assessment versus risk of bias in systematic reviews: AMSTAR and ROBIS had similar reliability but differed in their construct and applicability
by Banzi, Rita
Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2018, Vol.99, p.24-32
13.
Preferred reporting items for overviews of systematic reviews including harms checklist: a pilot tool to be used for balanced reporting of benefits and harms
by Bougioukas, Konstantinos I
Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2018, Vol.93, p.9-24
14.
Few studies exist examining methods for selecting studies, abstracting data, and appraising quality in a systematic review
by Robson, Reid C
Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2019, Vol.106, p.121-135
15.
Global Health and Development in Early Childhood
by Aboud, Frances E
Annual review of psychology, 2015, Vol.66 (1), p.433-457
16.
Reporting guidelines on how to write a complete and transparent abstract for overviews of systematic reviews of health care interventions
by Bougioukas, Konstantinos I
Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2019, Vol.106, p.70-79
17.
Systematic reviews of clinical practice guidelines: a methodological guide
by Johnston, Amy
Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2019, Vol.108, p.64-76
18.
The evidence for ‘flipping out’: A systematic review of the flipped classroom in nursing education
by Betihavas, Vasiliki
Nurse education today, 2016, Vol.38, p.15-21
19.
The risk of overweight/obesity in mid-life and late life for the development of dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies
by Pedditzi, Emilio
Age and ageing, 2016, Vol.45 (1), p.14-21
20.
A psychometric study found AMSTAR 2 to be a valid and moderately reliable appraisal tool
by Lorenz, Robert C
Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2019, Vol.114, p.133-140
