schliessen

Filtern

 

Bibliotheken

Smoking cessation and socioeconomic status:An update of existing evidence from a national evaluation of english stop smoking services

Smokers from lower socioeconomic groups are less likely to be successful in stopping smoking than more affluent smokers, even after accessing cessation programmes. Data were analysed from 3057 clients of nine services. Routine monitoring data were expanded with CO validated smoking status at 52-week... Full description

Journal Title: Hiscock R., Dobbie, F. and Bauld, L., 2015. Smoking cessation and socioeconomic status:An update of existing evidence from a national evaluation of english stop smoking services. BioMed Research International, 2015, 274056.
Main Author: Hiscock, Rosemary
Other Authors: Dobbie, Fiona , Bauld, Linda
Format: Electronic Article Electronic Article
Language:
Quelle: University of Bath
ID: DOI: 10.1155/2015/274056
Zum Text:
SendSend as email Add to Book BagAdd to Book Bag
Staff View
recordid: bath_opus46883
title: Smoking cessation and socioeconomic status:An update of existing evidence from a national evaluation of english stop smoking services
format: Article
creator:
  • Hiscock, Rosemary
  • Dobbie, Fiona
  • Bauld, Linda
ispartof: Hiscock, R., Dobbie, F. and Bauld, L., 2015. Smoking cessation and socioeconomic status:An update of existing evidence from a national evaluation of english stop smoking services. BioMed Research International, 2015, 274056.
description: Smokers from lower socioeconomic groups are less likely to be successful in stopping smoking than more affluent smokers, even after accessing cessation programmes. Data were analysed from 3057 clients of nine services. Routine monitoring data were expanded with CO validated smoking status at 52-week follow-up. Backwards logistic regression modelling was used to consider which factors were most important in explaining the relationship between SES and quitting. The odds ratio of stopping smoking among more affluent clients, compared with more disadvantaged clients, after taking into account design variables only, was 1.85 (95% CI 1.44 to 2.37) which declined to 1.44 (1.11 to 1.87) when all controls were included. The factors that explained more than 10% of the decline in the odds ratio were age, proportion of friends and family who smoked, nicotine dependence, and taking varenicline. A range of factors contribute to lower cessation rates for disadvantaged smokers. Some of these can be modified by improved smoking cessation service provision, but others require contributions from wider efforts to improve material, human, and social capital.
language:
source: University of Bath
identifier: DOI: 10.1155/2015/274056
fulltext: fulltext_linktorsrc
url: Link


@attributes
ID621650166
RANK0.07
NO1
SEARCH_ENGINEprimo_central_multiple_fe
SEARCH_ENGINE_TYPEPrimo Central Search Engine
LOCALfalse
PrimoNMBib
record
control
sourcerecordid46883
sourceidbath_opus
recordidTN_bath_opus46883
sourcesystemPC
display
typearticle
titleSmoking cessation and socioeconomic status:An update of existing evidence from a national evaluation of english stop smoking services
creatorHiscock, Rosemary ; Dobbie, Fiona ; Bauld, Linda
ispartofHiscock, R., Dobbie, F. and Bauld, L., 2015. Smoking cessation and socioeconomic status:An update of existing evidence from a national evaluation of english stop smoking services. BioMed Research International, 2015, 274056.
identifier DOI: 10.1155/2015/274056
descriptionSmokers from lower socioeconomic groups are less likely to be successful in stopping smoking than more affluent smokers, even after accessing cessation programmes. Data were analysed from 3057 clients of nine services. Routine monitoring data were expanded with CO validated smoking status at 52-week follow-up. Backwards logistic regression modelling was used to consider which factors were most important in explaining the relationship between SES and quitting. The odds ratio of stopping smoking among more affluent clients, compared with more disadvantaged clients, after taking into account design variables only, was 1.85 (95% CI 1.44 to 2.37) which declined to 1.44 (1.11 to 1.87) when all controls were included. The factors that explained more than 10% of the decline in the odds ratio were age, proportion of friends and family who smoked, nicotine dependence, and taking varenicline. A range of factors contribute to lower cessation rates for disadvantaged smokers. Some of these can be modified by improved smoking cessation service provision, but others require contributions from wider efforts to improve material, human, and social capital.
sourceUniversity of Bath
oafree_for_read
links
openurl$$Topenurl_article
backlink
0$$Uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/274056$$EView_source_record
1$$Uhttp://opus.bath.ac.uk/46883/$$EView_this_record_in_the_University_of_Bath
linktorsrc$$Uhttp://opus.bath.ac.uk/46883/1/Smoking_cessation_and_socio_economic_status.pdf$$EView_full_text_in_the_University_of_Bath_(PDF_format)
openurlfulltext$$Topenurlfull_article
search
creatorcontrib
0Hiscock, Rosemary
1Dobbie, Fiona
2Bauld, Linda
titleSmoking cessation and socioeconomic status:An update of existing evidence from a national evaluation of english stop smoking services
descriptionSmokers from lower socioeconomic groups are less likely to be successful in stopping smoking than more affluent smokers, even after accessing cessation programmes. Data were analysed from 3057 clients of nine services. Routine monitoring data were expanded with CO validated smoking status at 52-week follow-up. Backwards logistic regression modelling was used to consider which factors were most important in explaining the relationship between SES and quitting. The odds ratio of stopping smoking among more affluent clients, compared with more disadvantaged clients, after taking into account design variables only, was 1.85 (95% CI 1.44 to 2.37) which declined to 1.44 (1.11 to 1.87) when all controls were included. The factors that explained more than 10% of the decline in the odds ratio were age, proportion of friends and family who smoked, nicotine dependence, and taking varenicline. A range of factors contribute to lower cessation rates for disadvantaged smokers. Some of these can be modified by improved smoking cessation service provision, but others require contributions from wider efforts to improve material, human, and social capital.
general
010.1155/2015/274056
1Articles
2PeerReviewed
3University of Bath
4Opus: Online Publications Store
sourceidbath_opus
recordidbath_opus46883
rsrctypearticle
creationdate2015
addtitleHiscock, R., Dobbie, F. and Bauld, L., 2015. Smoking cessation and socioeconomic status:An update of existing evidence from a national evaluation of english stop smoking services. BioMed Research International, 2015, 274056.
searchscopebath_opus
scopebath_opus
sort
titleSmoking cessation and socioeconomic status:An update of existing evidence from a national evaluation of english stop smoking services
authorHiscock, Rosemary ; Dobbie, Fiona ; Bauld, Linda
creationdate20150000
facets
frbrgroupid-6921828001936758586
frbrtype6
creationdate2015
collectionOpus: Online Publications Store
prefilterarticles
rsrctypearticles
creatorcontrib
0Hiscock, Rosemary
1Dobbie, Fiona
2Bauld, Linda
delivery
delcategoryRemote Search Resource
fulltextfulltext_linktorsrc
addata
aulast
0Hiscock
1Dobbie
2Bauld
aufirst
0Rosemary
1Fiona
2Linda
au
0Hiscock, Rosemary
1Dobbie, Fiona
2Bauld, Linda
atitleSmoking cessation and socioeconomic status:An update of existing evidence from a national evaluation of english stop smoking services
date2015
risdate2015
genrearticle
ristypeJOUR
abstractSmokers from lower socioeconomic groups are less likely to be successful in stopping smoking than more affluent smokers, even after accessing cessation programmes. Data were analysed from 3057 clients of nine services. Routine monitoring data were expanded with CO validated smoking status at 52-week follow-up. Backwards logistic regression modelling was used to consider which factors were most important in explaining the relationship between SES and quitting. The odds ratio of stopping smoking among more affluent clients, compared with more disadvantaged clients, after taking into account design variables only, was 1.85 (95% CI 1.44 to 2.37) which declined to 1.44 (1.11 to 1.87) when all controls were included. The factors that explained more than 10% of the decline in the odds ratio were age, proportion of friends and family who smoked, nicotine dependence, and taking varenicline. A range of factors contribute to lower cessation rates for disadvantaged smokers. Some of these can be modified by improved smoking cessation service provision, but others require contributions from wider efforts to improve material, human, and social capital.
urlhttp://opus.bath.ac.uk/46883/1/Smoking_cessation_and_socio_economic_status.pdf
formatarticle
oafree_for_read