schliessen

Filtern

 

Bibliotheken

Cover Image

Safety and efficacy of tapentadol ER in patients with painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy: results of a randomized-withdrawal, placebo-controlled trial

Abstract Objective: Painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) may not be adequately managed with available therapeutic options. This phase III, randomized-withdrawal, placebo-controlled trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of tapentadol extended release (ER) for relieving painful DPN. Research... Full description

Journal Title: Current medical research and opinion 2011-01, Vol.27 (1), p.151-162
Main Author: Schwartz, Sherwyn
Other Authors: Etropolski, Mila , Shapiro, Douglas Y , Okamoto, Akiko , Lange, Robert , Haeussler, Juergen , Rauschkolb, Christine
Format: Electronic Article Electronic Article
Language: English
Subjects:
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Algorithms
Analgesics, Opioid - administration & dosage
Analgesics, Opioid - adverse effects
Analgesics, Opioid - therapeutic use
Chronic pain
Delayed-Action Preparations
Diabetic Neuropathies - drug therapy
Diabetic peripheral neuropathy
Double-Blind Method
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Pain - drug therapy
Pain Measurement
Phenols - administration & dosage
Phenols - adverse effects
Phenols - therapeutic use
Placebos
Tapentadol ER
Treatment Outcome
Withholding Treatment - statistics & numerical data
Quelle: Alma/SFX Local Collection
Publisher: England: Informa UK Ltd
ID: ISSN: 0300-7995
Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21162697
Zum Text:
SendSend as email Add to Book BagAdd to Book Bag
Staff View
recordid: cdi_informahealthcare_journals_10_1185_03007995_2010_537589
title: Safety and efficacy of tapentadol ER in patients with painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy: results of a randomized-withdrawal, placebo-controlled trial
format: Article
creator:
  • Schwartz, Sherwyn
  • Etropolski, Mila
  • Shapiro, Douglas Y
  • Okamoto, Akiko
  • Lange, Robert
  • Haeussler, Juergen
  • Rauschkolb, Christine
subjects:
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Algorithms
  • Analgesics, Opioid - administration & dosage
  • Analgesics, Opioid - adverse effects
  • Analgesics, Opioid - therapeutic use
  • Chronic pain
  • Delayed-Action Preparations
  • Diabetic Neuropathies - drug therapy
  • Diabetic peripheral neuropathy
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Pain - drug therapy
  • Pain Measurement
  • Phenols - administration & dosage
  • Phenols - adverse effects
  • Phenols - therapeutic use
  • Placebos
  • Tapentadol ER
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Withholding Treatment - statistics & numerical data
ispartof: Current medical research and opinion, 2011-01, Vol.27 (1), p.151-162
description: Abstract Objective: Painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) may not be adequately managed with available therapeutic options. This phase III, randomized-withdrawal, placebo-controlled trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of tapentadol extended release (ER) for relieving painful DPN. Research design and methods: Patients (n = 588) with at least a 3-month history of opioid and/or non-opioid analgesic use for DPN, dissatisfaction with current treatment, and an average pain intensity score of at least 5 on an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS; 0 = 'no pain,' 10 = 'pain as bad as you can imagine') were titrated to an optimal dose of tapentadol ER (100-250 mg bid) during a 3-week open-label phase. Subsequently, patients (n = 395) with at least a 1-point reduction in pain intensity were randomized 1:1 to receive placebo or the optimal fixed dose of tapentadol ER determined during the open-label phase for a 12-week double-blind phase. Clinical trial registration: NCT00455520. Main outcome measures: The primary efficacy outcome was the change in average pain intensity from randomization, determined by twice-daily NRS measurements. Safety was assessed throughout the study. Results: The least-squares mean difference between groups in the change in average pain intensity from the start of double-blind treatment to week 12 was −1.3 (95% confidence interval, −1.70 to −0.92; p 
language: eng
source: Alma/SFX Local Collection
identifier: ISSN: 0300-7995
fulltext: fulltext
issn:
  • 0300-7995
  • 1473-4877
url: Link


@attributes
NO1
SEARCH_ENGINEprimo_central_multiple_fe
SEARCH_ENGINE_TYPEPrimo Central Search Engine
RANK2.643395
LOCALfalse
PrimoNMBib
record
control
sourceidproquest_infor
recordidTN_cdi_informahealthcare_journals_10_1185_03007995_2010_537589
sourceformatXML
sourcesystemPC
sourcerecordid818644210
originalsourceidFETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-c3679ba5bba149b5e37f4776a9e39035a4e3af8a67bfa1d700d2f7d43cf8e5593
addsrcrecordideNqFkU9rFTEUxQdR7Gv1G4hk58apyWRmMulCkdKqUBD8sw53khteSt5kTDI8nh_FT2uG1wq6sKuQyzm_ezmnql4wes7Y0L2hnFIhZXfe0DLquOgG-ajasFbwuh2EeFxtVkm9ak6q05RuKWXNIOXT6qRhrG96KTbVr69gMR8ITIagtU6DPpBgSYYZpwwmeHL1hbiJzJBdmSSyd3lbfm6yiyfGwYjZaTJjdPMWI3gy4RJDkW8PFyRiWnwxFSKQWJaEnfuJpl4hJsIe_Gsye9A4hlqHKcfgPRqSowP_rHpiwSd8fveeVd-vr75dfqxvPn_4dPn-ptYt57nWvBdyhG4cgbVy7JAL2wrRg0QuKe-gRQ52gF6MFpgRlJrGCtNybQfsOsnPqldH7hzDjwVTVjuXNHoPE4YlqYENfds2jBZle1TqGFKKaNUc3Q7iQTGq1lLUfSlqLUUdSym2l3cLlnGH5o_pvoUiuPiHq10uea-BgPMP0d8dzaWREHewD9EbleHgQ7Qlcu2S4g8Q3v5F2CL4vNUQUd2GJU4l_P-f8BttvMTo
sourcetypeAggregation Database
isCDItrue
recordtypearticle
pqid818644210
display
typearticle
titleSafety and efficacy of tapentadol ER in patients with painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy: results of a randomized-withdrawal, placebo-controlled trial
sourceAlma/SFX Local Collection
creatorSchwartz, Sherwyn ; Etropolski, Mila ; Shapiro, Douglas Y ; Okamoto, Akiko ; Lange, Robert ; Haeussler, Juergen ; Rauschkolb, Christine
creatorcontribSchwartz, Sherwyn ; Etropolski, Mila ; Shapiro, Douglas Y ; Okamoto, Akiko ; Lange, Robert ; Haeussler, Juergen ; Rauschkolb, Christine
descriptionAbstract Objective: Painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) may not be adequately managed with available therapeutic options. This phase III, randomized-withdrawal, placebo-controlled trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of tapentadol extended release (ER) for relieving painful DPN. Research design and methods: Patients (n = 588) with at least a 3-month history of opioid and/or non-opioid analgesic use for DPN, dissatisfaction with current treatment, and an average pain intensity score of at least 5 on an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS; 0 = 'no pain,' 10 = 'pain as bad as you can imagine') were titrated to an optimal dose of tapentadol ER (100-250 mg bid) during a 3-week open-label phase. Subsequently, patients (n = 395) with at least a 1-point reduction in pain intensity were randomized 1:1 to receive placebo or the optimal fixed dose of tapentadol ER determined during the open-label phase for a 12-week double-blind phase. Clinical trial registration: NCT00455520. Main outcome measures: The primary efficacy outcome was the change in average pain intensity from randomization, determined by twice-daily NRS measurements. Safety was assessed throughout the study. Results: The least-squares mean difference between groups in the change in average pain intensity from the start of double-blind treatment to week 12 was −1.3 (95% confidence interval, −1.70 to −0.92; p < 0.001, tapentadol ER vs. placebo). A total of 60.5% (356/588) of patients reported at least a 30% improvement in pain intensity from the start to the end of the open-label titration phase; of the patients who were randomized to tapentadol ER, 53.6% (105/196) reported at least a 30% improvement from pre-titration to week 12 of the double-blind phase. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events that occurred during double-blind treatment with tapentadol ER included nausea, anxiety, diarrhea, and dizziness. Potential limitations of this study are related to the enriched enrollment randomized-withdrawal trial design, which may result in a more homogeneous patient population during double-blind treatment and may present a risk of unblinding because of changes in side effects from the open-label to the double-blind phase. Conclusions: Compared with placebo, tapentadol ER 100-250 mg bid provided a statistically significant difference in the maintenance of a clinically important improvement in pain1,2 and was well-tolerated by patients with painful DPN.
identifier
0ISSN: 0300-7995
1EISSN: 1473-4877
2DOI: 10.1185/03007995.2010.537589
3PMID: 21162697
languageeng
publisherEngland: Informa UK Ltd
subjectAdult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Algorithms ; Analgesics, Opioid - administration & dosage ; Analgesics, Opioid - adverse effects ; Analgesics, Opioid - therapeutic use ; Chronic pain ; Delayed-Action Preparations ; Diabetic Neuropathies - drug therapy ; Diabetic peripheral neuropathy ; Double-Blind Method ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pain - drug therapy ; Pain Measurement ; Phenols - administration & dosage ; Phenols - adverse effects ; Phenols - therapeutic use ; Placebos ; Tapentadol ER ; Treatment Outcome ; Withholding Treatment - statistics & numerical data
ispartofCurrent medical research and opinion, 2011-01, Vol.27 (1), p.151-162
rights
02011 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted
12011 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted 2011
lds50peer_reviewed
citedbyFETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-c3679ba5bba149b5e37f4776a9e39035a4e3af8a67bfa1d700d2f7d43cf8e5593
citesFETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-c3679ba5bba149b5e37f4776a9e39035a4e3af8a67bfa1d700d2f7d43cf8e5593
links
openurl$$Topenurl_article
openurlfulltext$$Topenurlfull_article
thumbnail$$Usyndetics_thumb_exl
backlink$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21162697$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
search
creatorcontrib
0Schwartz, Sherwyn
1Etropolski, Mila
2Shapiro, Douglas Y
3Okamoto, Akiko
4Lange, Robert
5Haeussler, Juergen
6Rauschkolb, Christine
title
0Safety and efficacy of tapentadol ER in patients with painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy: results of a randomized-withdrawal, placebo-controlled trial
1Current medical research and opinion
addtitleCurr Med Res Opin
descriptionAbstract Objective: Painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) may not be adequately managed with available therapeutic options. This phase III, randomized-withdrawal, placebo-controlled trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of tapentadol extended release (ER) for relieving painful DPN. Research design and methods: Patients (n = 588) with at least a 3-month history of opioid and/or non-opioid analgesic use for DPN, dissatisfaction with current treatment, and an average pain intensity score of at least 5 on an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS; 0 = 'no pain,' 10 = 'pain as bad as you can imagine') were titrated to an optimal dose of tapentadol ER (100-250 mg bid) during a 3-week open-label phase. Subsequently, patients (n = 395) with at least a 1-point reduction in pain intensity were randomized 1:1 to receive placebo or the optimal fixed dose of tapentadol ER determined during the open-label phase for a 12-week double-blind phase. Clinical trial registration: NCT00455520. Main outcome measures: The primary efficacy outcome was the change in average pain intensity from randomization, determined by twice-daily NRS measurements. Safety was assessed throughout the study. Results: The least-squares mean difference between groups in the change in average pain intensity from the start of double-blind treatment to week 12 was −1.3 (95% confidence interval, −1.70 to −0.92; p < 0.001, tapentadol ER vs. placebo). A total of 60.5% (356/588) of patients reported at least a 30% improvement in pain intensity from the start to the end of the open-label titration phase; of the patients who were randomized to tapentadol ER, 53.6% (105/196) reported at least a 30% improvement from pre-titration to week 12 of the double-blind phase. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events that occurred during double-blind treatment with tapentadol ER included nausea, anxiety, diarrhea, and dizziness. Potential limitations of this study are related to the enriched enrollment randomized-withdrawal trial design, which may result in a more homogeneous patient population during double-blind treatment and may present a risk of unblinding because of changes in side effects from the open-label to the double-blind phase. Conclusions: Compared with placebo, tapentadol ER 100-250 mg bid provided a statistically significant difference in the maintenance of a clinically important improvement in pain1,2 and was well-tolerated by patients with painful DPN.
subject
0Adult
1Aged
2Aged, 80 and over
3Algorithms
4Analgesics, Opioid - administration & dosage
5Analgesics, Opioid - adverse effects
6Analgesics, Opioid - therapeutic use
7Chronic pain
8Delayed-Action Preparations
9Diabetic Neuropathies - drug therapy
10Diabetic peripheral neuropathy
11Double-Blind Method
12Female
13Humans
14Male
15Middle Aged
16Pain - drug therapy
17Pain Measurement
18Phenols - administration & dosage
19Phenols - adverse effects
20Phenols - therapeutic use
21Placebos
22Tapentadol ER
23Treatment Outcome
24Withholding Treatment - statistics & numerical data
issn
00300-7995
11473-4877
fulltexttrue
rsrctypearticle
creationdate2011
recordtypearticle
recordideNqFkU9rFTEUxQdR7Gv1G4hk58apyWRmMulCkdKqUBD8sw53khteSt5kTDI8nh_FT2uG1wq6sKuQyzm_ezmnql4wes7Y0L2hnFIhZXfe0DLquOgG-ajasFbwuh2EeFxtVkm9ak6q05RuKWXNIOXT6qRhrG96KTbVr69gMR8ITIagtU6DPpBgSYYZpwwmeHL1hbiJzJBdmSSyd3lbfm6yiyfGwYjZaTJjdPMWI3gy4RJDkW8PFyRiWnwxFSKQWJaEnfuJpl4hJsIe_Gsye9A4hlqHKcfgPRqSowP_rHpiwSd8fveeVd-vr75dfqxvPn_4dPn-ptYt57nWvBdyhG4cgbVy7JAL2wrRg0QuKe-gRQ52gF6MFpgRlJrGCtNybQfsOsnPqldH7hzDjwVTVjuXNHoPE4YlqYENfds2jBZle1TqGFKKaNUc3Q7iQTGq1lLUfSlqLUUdSym2l3cLlnGH5o_pvoUiuPiHq10uea-BgPMP0d8dzaWREHewD9EbleHgQ7Qlcu2S4g8Q3v5F2CL4vNUQUd2GJU4l_P-f8BttvMTo
startdate201101
enddate201101
creator
0Schwartz, Sherwyn
1Etropolski, Mila
2Shapiro, Douglas Y
3Okamoto, Akiko
4Lange, Robert
5Haeussler, Juergen
6Rauschkolb, Christine
general
0Informa UK Ltd
1Taylor & Francis
scope
0CGR
1CUY
2CVF
3ECM
4EIF
5NPM
6AAYXX
7CITATION
87X8
sort
creationdate201101
titleSafety and efficacy of tapentadol ER in patients with painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy: results of a randomized-withdrawal, placebo-controlled trial
authorSchwartz, Sherwyn ; Etropolski, Mila ; Shapiro, Douglas Y ; Okamoto, Akiko ; Lange, Robert ; Haeussler, Juergen ; Rauschkolb, Christine
facets
frbrtype5
frbrgroupidcdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-c3679ba5bba149b5e37f4776a9e39035a4e3af8a67bfa1d700d2f7d43cf8e5593
rsrctypearticles
prefilterarticles
languageeng
creationdate2011
topic
0Adult
1Aged
2Aged, 80 and over
3Algorithms
4Analgesics, Opioid - administration & dosage
5Analgesics, Opioid - adverse effects
6Analgesics, Opioid - therapeutic use
7Chronic pain
8Delayed-Action Preparations
9Diabetic Neuropathies - drug therapy
10Diabetic peripheral neuropathy
11Double-Blind Method
12Female
13Humans
14Male
15Middle Aged
16Pain - drug therapy
17Pain Measurement
18Phenols - administration & dosage
19Phenols - adverse effects
20Phenols - therapeutic use
21Placebos
22Tapentadol ER
23Treatment Outcome
24Withholding Treatment - statistics & numerical data
toplevel
0peer_reviewed
1online_resources
creatorcontrib
0Schwartz, Sherwyn
1Etropolski, Mila
2Shapiro, Douglas Y
3Okamoto, Akiko
4Lange, Robert
5Haeussler, Juergen
6Rauschkolb, Christine
collection
0Medline
1MEDLINE
2MEDLINE (Ovid)
3MEDLINE
4MEDLINE
5PubMed
6CrossRef
7MEDLINE - Academic
jtitleCurrent medical research and opinion
delivery
delcategoryRemote Search Resource
fulltextfulltext
addata
au
0Schwartz, Sherwyn
1Etropolski, Mila
2Shapiro, Douglas Y
3Okamoto, Akiko
4Lange, Robert
5Haeussler, Juergen
6Rauschkolb, Christine
formatjournal
genrearticle
ristypeJOUR
atitleSafety and efficacy of tapentadol ER in patients with painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy: results of a randomized-withdrawal, placebo-controlled trial
jtitleCurrent medical research and opinion
addtitleCurr Med Res Opin
date2011-01
risdate2011
volume27
issue1
spage151
epage162
pages151-162
issn0300-7995
eissn1473-4877
abstractAbstract Objective: Painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) may not be adequately managed with available therapeutic options. This phase III, randomized-withdrawal, placebo-controlled trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of tapentadol extended release (ER) for relieving painful DPN. Research design and methods: Patients (n = 588) with at least a 3-month history of opioid and/or non-opioid analgesic use for DPN, dissatisfaction with current treatment, and an average pain intensity score of at least 5 on an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS; 0 = 'no pain,' 10 = 'pain as bad as you can imagine') were titrated to an optimal dose of tapentadol ER (100-250 mg bid) during a 3-week open-label phase. Subsequently, patients (n = 395) with at least a 1-point reduction in pain intensity were randomized 1:1 to receive placebo or the optimal fixed dose of tapentadol ER determined during the open-label phase for a 12-week double-blind phase. Clinical trial registration: NCT00455520. Main outcome measures: The primary efficacy outcome was the change in average pain intensity from randomization, determined by twice-daily NRS measurements. Safety was assessed throughout the study. Results: The least-squares mean difference between groups in the change in average pain intensity from the start of double-blind treatment to week 12 was −1.3 (95% confidence interval, −1.70 to −0.92; p < 0.001, tapentadol ER vs. placebo). A total of 60.5% (356/588) of patients reported at least a 30% improvement in pain intensity from the start to the end of the open-label titration phase; of the patients who were randomized to tapentadol ER, 53.6% (105/196) reported at least a 30% improvement from pre-titration to week 12 of the double-blind phase. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events that occurred during double-blind treatment with tapentadol ER included nausea, anxiety, diarrhea, and dizziness. Potential limitations of this study are related to the enriched enrollment randomized-withdrawal trial design, which may result in a more homogeneous patient population during double-blind treatment and may present a risk of unblinding because of changes in side effects from the open-label to the double-blind phase. Conclusions: Compared with placebo, tapentadol ER 100-250 mg bid provided a statistically significant difference in the maintenance of a clinically important improvement in pain1,2 and was well-tolerated by patients with painful DPN.
copEngland
pubInforma UK Ltd
pmid21162697
doi10.1185/03007995.2010.537589