schliessen

Filtern

 

Bibliotheken

STOCHASTICITY OVERRULES THE "THREE-TIMES RULE": GENETIC DRIFT, GENETIC DRAFT, AND COALESCENCE TIMES FOR NUCLEAR LOCI VERSUS MITOCHONDRIAL DNA

Palumbi et al. (2001) proposed a "three-times rule" that uses mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) sequences to predict probabilities of monophyly for nuclear loci (i.e., whether the alleles within a taxon coalesce with one another before they coalesce with alleles from a sister taxon). They use neutral coales... Full description

Journal Title: Evolution 2003-01, Vol.57 (1), p.182-190
Main Author: HUDSON, RICHARD R.
Other Authors: TURELLI, MICHAEL
Format: Electronic Article Electronic Article
Language: English
Subjects:
DNA
Publisher: Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd
ID: ISSN: 0014-3820
Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12643581
Zum Text:
SendSend as email Add to Book BagAdd to Book Bag
Staff View
recordid: cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73116429
title: STOCHASTICITY OVERRULES THE "THREE-TIMES RULE": GENETIC DRIFT, GENETIC DRAFT, AND COALESCENCE TIMES FOR NUCLEAR LOCI VERSUS MITOCHONDRIAL DNA
format: Article
creator:
  • HUDSON, RICHARD R.
  • TURELLI, MICHAEL
subjects:
  • Alleles
  • Analysis
  • Cell Nucleus - genetics
  • Coalescence theory
  • Comments
  • Comparative analysis
  • Confidence interval
  • Confidence Intervals
  • Deoxyribonucleic acid
  • DNA
  • DNA, Mitochondrial - genetics
  • Evolution
  • Evolutionary genetics
  • Genetic aspects
  • Genetic Drift
  • Genetic loci
  • Genetic mutation
  • Genetic research
  • Genetics
  • linked selection
  • Mitochondrial DNA
  • Monophyly
  • Population biology
  • Population size
  • species identification
  • Stochastic models
  • Stochastic Processes
  • Taxa
  • three-times rule
  • We they distinction
ispartof: Evolution, 2003-01, Vol.57 (1), p.182-190
description: Palumbi et al. (2001) proposed a "three-times rule" that uses mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) sequences to predict probabilities of monophyly for nuclear loci (i.e., whether the alleles within a taxon coalesce with one another before they coalesce with alleles from a sister taxon). They use neutral coalescent theory to infer these probabilities from the ratio of interspecific divergence to intraspecific variation of mtDNA. We show that the estimated probabilities have very wide confidence intervals because of the inherent stochasticity of the mtDNA coalescent process. Under neutrality, the true probability of monophyly can be much higher, or much lower, than predicted by the three-times rule. We also review recent empirical and theoretical studies that refute neutrality-based predictions concerning mtDNA variation and divergence. We conclude that the three-times rule is neither a useful test for neutral molecular evolution nor a reliable guide to genealogical species.
language: eng
source:
identifier: ISSN: 0014-3820
fulltext: no_fulltext
issn:
  • 0014-3820
  • 1558-5646
url: Link


@attributes
NO1
SEARCH_ENGINEprimo_central_multiple_fe
SEARCH_ENGINE_TYPEPrimo Central Search Engine
RANK2.0932844
LOCALfalse
PrimoNMBib
record
control
sourceidgale_proqu
recordidTN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73116429
sourceformatXML
sourcesystemPC
galeidA101341951
jstor_id3094602
sourcerecordidA101341951
originalsourceidFETCH-LOGICAL-15142-bf3fb84d7917468ad916d2e2a1b0f1b3a3314147adff25fc267f0ca05ea07b700
addsrcrecordideNqVktuO0zAQhi0EYkvhDRCyisQVCT7FafYCKUrdNlI2kdK0K7ixnMRBKW2zJK3oPgTvjKNU5SBusC8sz3z_P5ZnAJhgZGOzPmxthDCz6JQgmyBE7WOOECGefX4CRthxppbDGX8KRlfsBrzoui1CyHOw9xzcYMIZdaZ4BH6ssiRY-qssDMLsE0w2Ik3XkVjBbCngJFumQlhZeGcCfXhyCxciFgaGszScZ-9_u_r91Y9nMEh8YxCIOBBwkM6TFMbrIBJ-CqMkCKGpslqv4F3YF09i4-VHcBb7L8GzSu06_epyjsF6LrJgaUXJIgz8yMIOZsTKK1rlU1a6HnYZn6rSw7wkmiicowrnVFGKGWauKquKOFVBuFuhQiFHK-TmLkJj8G7wfWibbyfdHeW-7gq926mDbk6ddCnGnBHPgJO_wG1zag_mbZIQFznUc7mB3g7QF7XTsj5UzbFVRe8ofYwwZdh8u6Hsf1Bml3pfF81BV7WJ_yG4HQRF23Rdqyv50NZ71T5KjGQ_CHIr-w7LvsOyHwR5GQR5NuI3l4ef8r0uf0kvnTfAxwH4bso-_oe1FJsEm_AYvB4Mtt2xaa8GFHmMoz5tDem6O-rzNa3ar5K71HXkfbyQnyMesw2n8h79BG83zF0
sourcetypeAggregation Database
isCDItrue
recordtypearticle
pqid227053976
display
typearticle
titleSTOCHASTICITY OVERRULES THE "THREE-TIMES RULE": GENETIC DRIFT, GENETIC DRAFT, AND COALESCENCE TIMES FOR NUCLEAR LOCI VERSUS MITOCHONDRIAL DNA
creatorHUDSON, RICHARD R. ; TURELLI, MICHAEL
creatorcontribHUDSON, RICHARD R. ; TURELLI, MICHAEL
descriptionPalumbi et al. (2001) proposed a "three-times rule" that uses mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) sequences to predict probabilities of monophyly for nuclear loci (i.e., whether the alleles within a taxon coalesce with one another before they coalesce with alleles from a sister taxon). They use neutral coalescent theory to infer these probabilities from the ratio of interspecific divergence to intraspecific variation of mtDNA. We show that the estimated probabilities have very wide confidence intervals because of the inherent stochasticity of the mtDNA coalescent process. Under neutrality, the true probability of monophyly can be much higher, or much lower, than predicted by the three-times rule. We also review recent empirical and theoretical studies that refute neutrality-based predictions concerning mtDNA variation and divergence. We conclude that the three-times rule is neither a useful test for neutral molecular evolution nor a reliable guide to genealogical species.
editionReceived April 30, 2002. Accepted September 11, 2002.
identifier
0ISSN: 0014-3820
1EISSN: 1558-5646
2DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00229.x
3PMID: 12643581
languageeng
publisherOxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd
subjectAlleles ; Analysis ; Cell Nucleus - genetics ; Coalescence theory ; Comments ; Comparative analysis ; Confidence interval ; Confidence Intervals ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; DNA ; DNA, Mitochondrial - genetics ; Evolution ; Evolutionary genetics ; Genetic aspects ; Genetic Drift ; Genetic loci ; Genetic mutation ; Genetic research ; Genetics ; linked selection ; Mitochondrial DNA ; Monophyly ; Population biology ; Population size ; species identification ; Stochastic models ; Stochastic Processes ; Taxa ; three-times rule ; We they distinction
ispartofEvolution, 2003-01, Vol.57 (1), p.182-190
rightsCopyright 2003 The Society for the Study of Evolution
citesFETCH-LOGICAL-15142-bf3fb84d7917468ad916d2e2a1b0f1b3a3314147adff25fc267f0ca05ea07b700
links
openurl$$Topenurl_article
thumbnail$$Usyndetics_thumb_exl
backlink$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12643581$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
search
creatorcontrib
0HUDSON, RICHARD R.
1TURELLI, MICHAEL
title
0STOCHASTICITY OVERRULES THE "THREE-TIMES RULE": GENETIC DRIFT, GENETIC DRAFT, AND COALESCENCE TIMES FOR NUCLEAR LOCI VERSUS MITOCHONDRIAL DNA
1Evolution
addtitleEvolution
descriptionPalumbi et al. (2001) proposed a "three-times rule" that uses mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) sequences to predict probabilities of monophyly for nuclear loci (i.e., whether the alleles within a taxon coalesce with one another before they coalesce with alleles from a sister taxon). They use neutral coalescent theory to infer these probabilities from the ratio of interspecific divergence to intraspecific variation of mtDNA. We show that the estimated probabilities have very wide confidence intervals because of the inherent stochasticity of the mtDNA coalescent process. Under neutrality, the true probability of monophyly can be much higher, or much lower, than predicted by the three-times rule. We also review recent empirical and theoretical studies that refute neutrality-based predictions concerning mtDNA variation and divergence. We conclude that the three-times rule is neither a useful test for neutral molecular evolution nor a reliable guide to genealogical species.
subject
0Alleles
1Analysis
2Cell Nucleus - genetics
3Coalescence theory
4Comments
5Comparative analysis
6Confidence interval
7Confidence Intervals
8Deoxyribonucleic acid
9DNA
10DNA, Mitochondrial - genetics
11Evolution
12Evolutionary genetics
13Genetic aspects
14Genetic Drift
15Genetic loci
16Genetic mutation
17Genetic research
18Genetics
19linked selection
20Mitochondrial DNA
21Monophyly
22Population biology
23Population size
24species identification
25Stochastic models
26Stochastic Processes
27Taxa
28three-times rule
29We they distinction
issn
00014-3820
11558-5646
fulltextfalse
rsrctypearticle
creationdate2003
recordtypearticle
recordideNqVktuO0zAQhi0EYkvhDRCyisQVCT7FafYCKUrdNlI2kdK0K7ixnMRBKW2zJK3oPgTvjKNU5SBusC8sz3z_P5ZnAJhgZGOzPmxthDCz6JQgmyBE7WOOECGefX4CRthxppbDGX8KRlfsBrzoui1CyHOw9xzcYMIZdaZ4BH6ssiRY-qssDMLsE0w2Ik3XkVjBbCngJFumQlhZeGcCfXhyCxciFgaGszScZ-9_u_r91Y9nMEh8YxCIOBBwkM6TFMbrIBJ-CqMkCKGpslqv4F3YF09i4-VHcBb7L8GzSu06_epyjsF6LrJgaUXJIgz8yMIOZsTKK1rlU1a6HnYZn6rSw7wkmiicowrnVFGKGWauKquKOFVBuFuhQiFHK-TmLkJj8G7wfWibbyfdHeW-7gq926mDbk6ddCnGnBHPgJO_wG1zag_mbZIQFznUc7mB3g7QF7XTsj5UzbFVRe8ofYwwZdh8u6Hsf1Bml3pfF81BV7WJ_yG4HQRF23Rdqyv50NZ71T5KjGQ_CHIr-w7LvsOyHwR5GQR5NuI3l4ef8r0uf0kvnTfAxwH4bso-_oe1FJsEm_AYvB4Mtt2xaa8GFHmMoz5tDem6O-rzNa3ar5K71HXkfbyQnyMesw2n8h79BG83zF0
startdate200301
enddate200301
creator
0HUDSON, RICHARD R.
1TURELLI, MICHAEL
general
0Blackwell Publishing Ltd
1Society for the Study of Evolution
2Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
scope
0BSCLL
1CGR
2CUY
3CVF
4ECM
5EIF
6NPM
7AAYXX
8CITATION
9BSHEE
107QG
117QL
127QP
137QR
147SN
157SS
167TK
177TM
187U9
198FD
20C1K
21FR3
22H94
23M7N
24P64
25RC3
267X8
sort
creationdate200301
titleSTOCHASTICITY OVERRULES THE "THREE-TIMES RULE": GENETIC DRIFT, GENETIC DRAFT, AND COALESCENCE TIMES FOR NUCLEAR LOCI VERSUS MITOCHONDRIAL DNA
authorHUDSON, RICHARD R. ; TURELLI, MICHAEL
facets
frbrtype5
frbrgroupidcdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-15142-bf3fb84d7917468ad916d2e2a1b0f1b3a3314147adff25fc267f0ca05ea07b700
rsrctypearticles
prefilterarticles
languageeng
creationdate2003
topic
0Alleles
1Analysis
2Cell Nucleus - genetics
3Coalescence theory
4Comments
5Comparative analysis
6Confidence interval
7Confidence Intervals
8Deoxyribonucleic acid
9DNA
10DNA, Mitochondrial - genetics
11Evolution
12Evolutionary genetics
13Genetic aspects
14Genetic Drift
15Genetic loci
16Genetic mutation
17Genetic research
18Genetics
19linked selection
20Mitochondrial DNA
21Monophyly
22Population biology
23Population size
24species identification
25Stochastic models
26Stochastic Processes
27Taxa
28three-times rule
29We they distinction
creatorcontrib
0HUDSON, RICHARD R.
1TURELLI, MICHAEL
collection
0Istex
1Medline
2MEDLINE
3MEDLINE (Ovid)
4MEDLINE
5MEDLINE
6PubMed
7CrossRef
8Academic OneFile (A&I only)
9Animal Behavior Abstracts
10Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)
11Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts
12Chemoreception Abstracts
13Ecology Abstracts
14Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)
15Neurosciences Abstracts
16Nucleic Acids Abstracts
17Virology and AIDS Abstracts
18Technology Research Database
19Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
20Engineering Research Database
21AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
22Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)
23Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
24Genetics Abstracts
25MEDLINE - Academic
jtitleEvolution
delivery
delcategoryRemote Search Resource
fulltextno_fulltext
addata
au
0HUDSON, RICHARD R.
1TURELLI, MICHAEL
formatjournal
genrearticle
ristypeJOUR
atitleSTOCHASTICITY OVERRULES THE "THREE-TIMES RULE": GENETIC DRIFT, GENETIC DRAFT, AND COALESCENCE TIMES FOR NUCLEAR LOCI VERSUS MITOCHONDRIAL DNA
jtitleEvolution
addtitleEvolution
date2003-01
risdate2003
volume57
issue1
spage182
epage190
pages182-190
issn0014-3820
eissn1558-5646
abstractPalumbi et al. (2001) proposed a "three-times rule" that uses mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) sequences to predict probabilities of monophyly for nuclear loci (i.e., whether the alleles within a taxon coalesce with one another before they coalesce with alleles from a sister taxon). They use neutral coalescent theory to infer these probabilities from the ratio of interspecific divergence to intraspecific variation of mtDNA. We show that the estimated probabilities have very wide confidence intervals because of the inherent stochasticity of the mtDNA coalescent process. Under neutrality, the true probability of monophyly can be much higher, or much lower, than predicted by the three-times rule. We also review recent empirical and theoretical studies that refute neutrality-based predictions concerning mtDNA variation and divergence. We conclude that the three-times rule is neither a useful test for neutral molecular evolution nor a reliable guide to genealogical species.
copOxford, UK
pubBlackwell Publishing Ltd
pmid12643581
doi10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00229.x
tpages9
editionReceived April 30, 2002. Accepted September 11, 2002.