schliessen

Filtern

 

Bibliotheken

Work stress, tobacco smoking and alcohol intake: a collaborative meta-analysis of individual-participant data from 15 European studies

Objectives In order to clarify the inconsistent evidence, we conducted individual-participant meta-analyses of the association of smoking and alcohol intake with work stress. Methods We analysed cross-sectional data from 15 (166 130 participants) and longitudinal data from four (48 905 participants)... Full description

Journal Title: Occupational and environmental medicine (London England), 2011-09, Vol.68 (Suppl 1), p.A76-A76
Main Author: Heikkila, K.
Format: Electronic Article Electronic Article
Language: English
Quelle: Alma/SFX Local Collection
Publisher: London: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
ID: ISSN: 1351-0711
Zum Text:
SendSend as email Add to Book BagAdd to Book Bag
Staff View
recordid: cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_911155863
title: Work stress, tobacco smoking and alcohol intake: a collaborative meta-analysis of individual-participant data from 15 European studies
format: Article
creator:
  • Heikkila, K.
ispartof: Occupational and environmental medicine (London, England), 2011-09, Vol.68 (Suppl 1), p.A76-A76
description: Objectives In order to clarify the inconsistent evidence, we conducted individual-participant meta-analyses of the association of smoking and alcohol intake with work stress. Methods We analysed cross-sectional data from 15 (166 130 participants) and longitudinal data from four (48 905 participants) European studies. Smoking, alcohol intake and work stress (operationalised as job strain) were participant-reported. Smoking was categorised into never, ex- and current, and alcohol intake into none, moderate (women: 1-14, men: 1-21 drinks/week), intermediate (women: 15–20, men: 22–27 drinks/week) and heavy (women: ≥21, men: ≥28 drinks/week). Cross-sectional associations were modelled using logistic regression and longitudinal associations using mixed effects logistic regression. The results were pooled in random effects meta-analyses. Results Current smokers had higher odds of job strain than never-smokers (OR: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.18). Current smokers with job strain smoked more than those without job strain. Compared to moderate drinkers, non-drinkers had higher (OR: 1.13, 95% CI: 1.08 to 1.17) and intermediate drinkers lower odds (OR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.86 to 0.99) of job strain. Ex-smoking (OR: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.93 to 1.06) and heavy alcohol intake (OR: 1.12, 95% CI: 0.99 to 1.27) were not associated with job strain. Neither smoking nor alcohol intake was longitudinally associated with job strain. Conclusions Our meta-analyses show that current smokers and non-drinkers are more likely and intermediate drinkers less likely to report work stress than never-smokers and moderate drinkers. Our findings suggest that smoking and drinking habits are associated with work stress but the association is probably not causal.
language: eng
source: Alma/SFX Local Collection
identifier: ISSN: 1351-0711
fulltext: fulltext
issn:
  • 1351-0711
  • 1470-7926
url: Link


@attributes
NO1
SEARCH_ENGINEprimo_central_multiple_fe
SEARCH_ENGINE_TYPEPrimo Central Search Engine
RANK2.2218077
LOCALfalse
PrimoNMBib
record
control
sourceidproquest_cross
recordidTN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_911155863
sourceformatXML
sourcesystemPC
sourcerecordid4024236381
originalsourceidFETCH-LOGICAL-12423-e6655aa9787686ccdc995c70b73bedcb7e6639d0a6be8c1b9c30bbe03039c40b3
addsrcrecordideNqNkc9u1DAQhyMEEqXlEZAsceCCiydO7JgbWsofUYqQSjlaY8cL3k3i1HYq-gI8N15SceDU08zh-81o5quqZ8BOAbh4FdzoelozAAqM8a4-rRvxoDqCRjIqVS0elp63QJkEeFw9SWnHGHDJ66Pq9_cQ9yTl6FJ6SXIwaG0gaQx7P_0gOPUEBxt-hoH4KePevSZIbBgGNCFi9jeOjC4jxQmH2-QTCdsC9v7G9wsOdMaYvfUzTpn0mJFsYxgJtORsiWF2OJXNS-9dOqkebXFI7uldPa6-vTu73Hyg51_ef9y8OadQNzWnToi2RVSyk6IT1vZWqdZKZiQ3rrdGFoCrnqEwrrNglOXMGMc448o2zPDj6sU6d47henEp69En68o9kwtL0goA2rYTvJDP_yN3YYnlzKRBdsDLL9WBalfKxpBSdFs9Rz9ivNXA9EGO_itHH-ToVY4uckqOrjmfsvv1L4Rxr4XkstUXVxv9-ZNori6_vtWy8Gzlzbi754o_VX-jIA
sourcetypeAggregation Database
isCDItrue
recordtypearticle
pqid1781307193
display
typearticle
titleWork stress, tobacco smoking and alcohol intake: a collaborative meta-analysis of individual-participant data from 15 European studies
sourceAlma/SFX Local Collection
creatorHeikkila, K.
creatorcontribHeikkila, K.
descriptionObjectives In order to clarify the inconsistent evidence, we conducted individual-participant meta-analyses of the association of smoking and alcohol intake with work stress. Methods We analysed cross-sectional data from 15 (166 130 participants) and longitudinal data from four (48 905 participants) European studies. Smoking, alcohol intake and work stress (operationalised as job strain) were participant-reported. Smoking was categorised into never, ex- and current, and alcohol intake into none, moderate (women: 1-14, men: 1-21 drinks/week), intermediate (women: 15–20, men: 22–27 drinks/week) and heavy (women: ≥21, men: ≥28 drinks/week). Cross-sectional associations were modelled using logistic regression and longitudinal associations using mixed effects logistic regression. The results were pooled in random effects meta-analyses. Results Current smokers had higher odds of job strain than never-smokers (OR: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.18). Current smokers with job strain smoked more than those without job strain. Compared to moderate drinkers, non-drinkers had higher (OR: 1.13, 95% CI: 1.08 to 1.17) and intermediate drinkers lower odds (OR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.86 to 0.99) of job strain. Ex-smoking (OR: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.93 to 1.06) and heavy alcohol intake (OR: 1.12, 95% CI: 0.99 to 1.27) were not associated with job strain. Neither smoking nor alcohol intake was longitudinally associated with job strain. Conclusions Our meta-analyses show that current smokers and non-drinkers are more likely and intermediate drinkers less likely to report work stress than never-smokers and moderate drinkers. Our findings suggest that smoking and drinking habits are associated with work stress but the association is probably not causal.
identifier
0ISSN: 1351-0711
1EISSN: 1470-7926
2DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2011-100382.246
languageeng
publisherLondon: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
ispartofOccupational and environmental medicine (London, England), 2011-09, Vol.68 (Suppl 1), p.A76-A76
rights
0Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
1Copyright: 2011 Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
lds50peer_reviewed
links
openurl$$Topenurl_article
openurlfulltext$$Topenurlfull_article
thumbnail$$Usyndetics_thumb_exl
search
creatorcontribHeikkila, K.
title
0Work stress, tobacco smoking and alcohol intake: a collaborative meta-analysis of individual-participant data from 15 European studies
1Occupational and environmental medicine (London, England)
addtitleOccup Environ Med
descriptionObjectives In order to clarify the inconsistent evidence, we conducted individual-participant meta-analyses of the association of smoking and alcohol intake with work stress. Methods We analysed cross-sectional data from 15 (166 130 participants) and longitudinal data from four (48 905 participants) European studies. Smoking, alcohol intake and work stress (operationalised as job strain) were participant-reported. Smoking was categorised into never, ex- and current, and alcohol intake into none, moderate (women: 1-14, men: 1-21 drinks/week), intermediate (women: 15–20, men: 22–27 drinks/week) and heavy (women: ≥21, men: ≥28 drinks/week). Cross-sectional associations were modelled using logistic regression and longitudinal associations using mixed effects logistic regression. The results were pooled in random effects meta-analyses. Results Current smokers had higher odds of job strain than never-smokers (OR: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.18). Current smokers with job strain smoked more than those without job strain. Compared to moderate drinkers, non-drinkers had higher (OR: 1.13, 95% CI: 1.08 to 1.17) and intermediate drinkers lower odds (OR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.86 to 0.99) of job strain. Ex-smoking (OR: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.93 to 1.06) and heavy alcohol intake (OR: 1.12, 95% CI: 0.99 to 1.27) were not associated with job strain. Neither smoking nor alcohol intake was longitudinally associated with job strain. Conclusions Our meta-analyses show that current smokers and non-drinkers are more likely and intermediate drinkers less likely to report work stress than never-smokers and moderate drinkers. Our findings suggest that smoking and drinking habits are associated with work stress but the association is probably not causal.
issn
01351-0711
11470-7926
fulltexttrue
rsrctypearticle
creationdate2011
recordtypearticle
recordideNqNkc9u1DAQhyMEEqXlEZAsceCCiydO7JgbWsofUYqQSjlaY8cL3k3i1HYq-gI8N15SceDU08zh-81o5quqZ8BOAbh4FdzoelozAAqM8a4-rRvxoDqCRjIqVS0elp63QJkEeFw9SWnHGHDJ66Pq9_cQ9yTl6FJ6SXIwaG0gaQx7P_0gOPUEBxt-hoH4KePevSZIbBgGNCFi9jeOjC4jxQmH2-QTCdsC9v7G9wsOdMaYvfUzTpn0mJFsYxgJtORsiWF2OJXNS-9dOqkebXFI7uldPa6-vTu73Hyg51_ef9y8OadQNzWnToi2RVSyk6IT1vZWqdZKZiQ3rrdGFoCrnqEwrrNglOXMGMc448o2zPDj6sU6d47henEp69En68o9kwtL0goA2rYTvJDP_yN3YYnlzKRBdsDLL9WBalfKxpBSdFs9Rz9ivNXA9EGO_itHH-ToVY4uckqOrjmfsvv1L4Rxr4XkstUXVxv9-ZNori6_vtWy8Gzlzbi754o_VX-jIA
startdate201109
enddate201109
creatorHeikkila, K.
general
0BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
1BMJ Publishing Group LTD
scope
0BSCLL
1AAYXX
2CITATION
33V.
47RV
57X7
67XB
788E
88C1
98FE
108FG
118FI
128FJ
138FK
14ABJCF
15ABUWG
16ATCPS
17AZQEC
18BENPR
19BGLVJ
20BHPHI
21BTHHO
22DWQXO
23FYUFA
24GHDGH
25GNUQQ
26HCIFZ
27K9.
28KB0
29L6V
30M0S
31M1P
32M7S
33NAPCQ
34PATMY
35PQEST
36PQQKQ
37PQUKI
38PRINS
39PTHSS
40PYCSY
417T2
427U2
43C1K
sort
creationdate201109
titleWork stress, tobacco smoking and alcohol intake: a collaborative meta-analysis of individual-participant data from 15 European studies
authorHeikkila, K.
facets
frbrtype5
frbrgroupidcdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-12423-e6655aa9787686ccdc995c70b73bedcb7e6639d0a6be8c1b9c30bbe03039c40b3
rsrctypearticles
prefilterarticles
languageeng
creationdate2011
toplevel
0peer_reviewed
1online_resources
creatorcontribHeikkila, K.
collection
0Istex
1CrossRef
2ProQuest Central (Corporate)
3Nursing & Allied Health Database
4Health & Medical Collection
5ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
6Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
7Public Health Database
8ProQuest SciTech Collection
9ProQuest Technology Collection
10Hospital Premium Collection
11Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
12ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
13Materials Science & Engineering Collection
14ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
15Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection
16ProQuest Central Essentials
17ProQuest Central
18Technology Collection
19Natural Science Collection
20BMJ Journals
21ProQuest Central Korea
22Health Research Premium Collection
23Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
24ProQuest Central Student
25SciTech Premium Collection
26ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
27Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)
28ProQuest Engineering Collection
29Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)
30Medical Database
31Engineering Database
32Nursing & Allied Health Premium
33Environmental Science Database
34ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
35ProQuest One Academic
36ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
37ProQuest Central China
38Engineering Collection
39Environmental Science Collection
40Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)
41Safety Science and Risk
42Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
jtitleOccupational and environmental medicine (London, England)
delivery
delcategoryRemote Search Resource
fulltextfulltext
addata
auHeikkila, K.
formatjournal
genrearticle
ristypeJOUR
atitleWork stress, tobacco smoking and alcohol intake: a collaborative meta-analysis of individual-participant data from 15 European studies
jtitleOccupational and environmental medicine (London, England)
addtitleOccup Environ Med
date2011-09
risdate2011
volume68
issueSuppl 1
spageA76
epageA76
pagesA76-A76
issn1351-0711
eissn1470-7926
abstractObjectives In order to clarify the inconsistent evidence, we conducted individual-participant meta-analyses of the association of smoking and alcohol intake with work stress. Methods We analysed cross-sectional data from 15 (166 130 participants) and longitudinal data from four (48 905 participants) European studies. Smoking, alcohol intake and work stress (operationalised as job strain) were participant-reported. Smoking was categorised into never, ex- and current, and alcohol intake into none, moderate (women: 1-14, men: 1-21 drinks/week), intermediate (women: 15–20, men: 22–27 drinks/week) and heavy (women: ≥21, men: ≥28 drinks/week). Cross-sectional associations were modelled using logistic regression and longitudinal associations using mixed effects logistic regression. The results were pooled in random effects meta-analyses. Results Current smokers had higher odds of job strain than never-smokers (OR: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.18). Current smokers with job strain smoked more than those without job strain. Compared to moderate drinkers, non-drinkers had higher (OR: 1.13, 95% CI: 1.08 to 1.17) and intermediate drinkers lower odds (OR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.86 to 0.99) of job strain. Ex-smoking (OR: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.93 to 1.06) and heavy alcohol intake (OR: 1.12, 95% CI: 0.99 to 1.27) were not associated with job strain. Neither smoking nor alcohol intake was longitudinally associated with job strain. Conclusions Our meta-analyses show that current smokers and non-drinkers are more likely and intermediate drinkers less likely to report work stress than never-smokers and moderate drinkers. Our findings suggest that smoking and drinking habits are associated with work stress but the association is probably not causal.
copLondon
pubBMJ Publishing Group Ltd
doi10.1136/oemed-2011-100382.246