schliessen

Filtern

 

Bibliotheken

Progress in glass sponge phylogenetics: a comment on Kersken et al. (2018)

Kersken et al. (Hydrobiologia 811:283–293, 2018 ) recently reported a phylogenetic analysis of ribosomal DNA of glass sponges (Porifera: Hexactinellida) including new specimens from the NE Pacific. Their study is important as it significantly increased the taxon sampling of this important deep-sea g... Full description

Journal Title: Hydrobiologia 2018, Vol.843 (1), p.51-59
Main Author: Dohrmann, Martin
Format: Electronic Article Electronic Article
Language: English
Subjects:
Publisher: Cham: Springer International Publishing
ID: ISSN: 0018-8158
Zum Text:
SendSend as email Add to Book BagAdd to Book Bag
Staff View
recordid: cdi_springer_journals_10_1007_s10750_018_3708_7
title: Progress in glass sponge phylogenetics: a comment on Kersken et al. (2018)
format: Article
creator:
  • Dohrmann, Martin
subjects:
  • Analysis
  • Biomedical and Life Sciences
  • Ecology
  • Freshwater & Marine Ecology
  • Life Sciences
  • Opinion Paper
  • Phylogeny
  • Zoology
ispartof: Hydrobiologia, 2018, Vol.843 (1), p.51-59
description: Kersken et al. (Hydrobiologia 811:283–293, 2018 ) recently reported a phylogenetic analysis of ribosomal DNA of glass sponges (Porifera: Hexactinellida) including new specimens from the NE Pacific. Their study is important as it significantly increased the taxon sampling of this important deep-sea group. Unfortunately, there are several issues with these authors’ dataset assembly and choice of phylogenetic analysis methods. Furthermore, they did not consider previous literature that is highly relevant to interpretation of their results. Here I provide critically constructive comments on their paper and present an alternative analysis that utilizes established methodological techniques. I show that several of Kersken et al.’s findings and claims are unsustainable, and provide an extended discussion of the updated glass sponge phylogeny.
language: eng
source:
identifier: ISSN: 0018-8158
fulltext: no_fulltext
issn:
  • 0018-8158
  • 1573-5117
url: Link


@attributes
NO1
SEARCH_ENGINEprimo_central_multiple_fe
SEARCH_ENGINE_TYPEPrimo Central Search Engine
RANK2.5592465
LOCALfalse
PrimoNMBib
record
control
sourceidgale_cross
recordidTN_cdi_springer_journals_10_1007_s10750_018_3708_7
sourceformatXML
sourcesystemPC
galeidA603673956
sourcerecordidA603673956
originalsourceidFETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-7fe9254b7b60fb7c25351e14a185316c0b7c3b33888a09ab06d767cdbfeccdac0
addsrcrecordideNp9kD9PwzAQxS0EEqXwAdg8wpByjuvYYasqyr9KMMBsOc4lpCR2ZYeh3x5XYUY33Ond_U56j5BrBgsGIO8iAykgA6YyLkFl8oTMmJA8E4zJUzKD40Yxoc7JRYw7SEyZw4y8vAffBoyRdo62vUlD3HvXIt1_HXrfosOxs_GeGmr9MKAbqXf0FUP8RkdxpKZf0Js8fb-9JGeN6SNe_fU5-dw8fKyfsu3b4_N6tc1sXqoxkw2WuVhWsiqgqaTNBRcM2dIwJTgrLCSNV5wrpQyUpoKiloW0ddWgtbWxMCeL6W9retSda_wYjE1V49BZ77Dpkr4qgBeSl6JIAJsAG3yMARu9D91gwkEz0Mf09JSeTi70MT0tE5NPTEy3KY6gd_4nuOTrH-gXYHhw3Q
sourcetypeAggregation Database
isCDItrue
recordtypearticle
display
typearticle
titleProgress in glass sponge phylogenetics: a comment on Kersken et al. (2018)
creatorDohrmann, Martin
creatorcontribDohrmann, Martin
descriptionKersken et al. (Hydrobiologia 811:283–293, 2018 ) recently reported a phylogenetic analysis of ribosomal DNA of glass sponges (Porifera: Hexactinellida) including new specimens from the NE Pacific. Their study is important as it significantly increased the taxon sampling of this important deep-sea group. Unfortunately, there are several issues with these authors’ dataset assembly and choice of phylogenetic analysis methods. Furthermore, they did not consider previous literature that is highly relevant to interpretation of their results. Here I provide critically constructive comments on their paper and present an alternative analysis that utilizes established methodological techniques. I show that several of Kersken et al.’s findings and claims are unsustainable, and provide an extended discussion of the updated glass sponge phylogeny.
identifier
0ISSN: 0018-8158
1EISSN: 1573-5117
2DOI: 10.1007/s10750-018-3708-7
languageeng
publisherCham: Springer International Publishing
subjectAnalysis ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Ecology ; Freshwater & Marine Ecology ; Life Sciences ; Opinion Paper ; Phylogeny ; Zoology
ispartofHydrobiologia, 2018, Vol.843 (1), p.51-59
rights
0Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018
1COPYRIGHT 2019 Springer
lds50peer_reviewed
citesFETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-7fe9254b7b60fb7c25351e14a185316c0b7c3b33888a09ab06d767cdbfeccdac0
links
openurl$$Topenurl_article
thumbnail$$Usyndetics_thumb_exl
search
creatorcontribDohrmann, Martin
title
0Progress in glass sponge phylogenetics: a comment on Kersken et al. (2018)
1Hydrobiologia
addtitleHydrobiologia
descriptionKersken et al. (Hydrobiologia 811:283–293, 2018 ) recently reported a phylogenetic analysis of ribosomal DNA of glass sponges (Porifera: Hexactinellida) including new specimens from the NE Pacific. Their study is important as it significantly increased the taxon sampling of this important deep-sea group. Unfortunately, there are several issues with these authors’ dataset assembly and choice of phylogenetic analysis methods. Furthermore, they did not consider previous literature that is highly relevant to interpretation of their results. Here I provide critically constructive comments on their paper and present an alternative analysis that utilizes established methodological techniques. I show that several of Kersken et al.’s findings and claims are unsustainable, and provide an extended discussion of the updated glass sponge phylogeny.
subject
0Analysis
1Biomedical and Life Sciences
2Ecology
3Freshwater & Marine Ecology
4Life Sciences
5Opinion Paper
6Phylogeny
7Zoology
issn
00018-8158
11573-5117
fulltextfalse
rsrctypearticle
creationdate2018
recordtypearticle
recordideNp9kD9PwzAQxS0EEqXwAdg8wpByjuvYYasqyr9KMMBsOc4lpCR2ZYeh3x5XYUY33Ond_U56j5BrBgsGIO8iAykgA6YyLkFl8oTMmJA8E4zJUzKD40Yxoc7JRYw7SEyZw4y8vAffBoyRdo62vUlD3HvXIt1_HXrfosOxs_GeGmr9MKAbqXf0FUP8RkdxpKZf0Js8fb-9JGeN6SNe_fU5-dw8fKyfsu3b4_N6tc1sXqoxkw2WuVhWsiqgqaTNBRcM2dIwJTgrLCSNV5wrpQyUpoKiloW0ddWgtbWxMCeL6W9retSda_wYjE1V49BZ77Dpkr4qgBeSl6JIAJsAG3yMARu9D91gwkEz0Mf09JSeTi70MT0tE5NPTEy3KY6gd_4nuOTrH-gXYHhw3Q
startdate20180801
enddate20180801
creatorDohrmann, Martin
general
0Springer International Publishing
1Springer
scope
0AAYXX
1CITATION
sort
creationdate20180801
titleProgress in glass sponge phylogenetics: a comment on Kersken et al. (2018)
authorDohrmann, Martin
facets
frbrtype5
frbrgroupidcdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-7fe9254b7b60fb7c25351e14a185316c0b7c3b33888a09ab06d767cdbfeccdac0
rsrctypearticles
prefilterarticles
languageeng
creationdate2018
topic
0Analysis
1Biomedical and Life Sciences
2Ecology
3Freshwater & Marine Ecology
4Life Sciences
5Opinion Paper
6Phylogeny
7Zoology
toplevelpeer_reviewed
creatorcontribDohrmann, Martin
collectionCrossRef
jtitleHydrobiologia
delivery
delcategoryRemote Search Resource
fulltextno_fulltext
addata
auDohrmann, Martin
formatjournal
genrearticle
ristypeJOUR
atitleProgress in glass sponge phylogenetics: a comment on Kersken et al. (2018)
jtitleHydrobiologia
stitleHydrobiologia
date2018-08-01
risdate2018
volume843
issue1
spage51
epage59
pages51-59
issn0018-8158
eissn1573-5117
abstractKersken et al. (Hydrobiologia 811:283–293, 2018 ) recently reported a phylogenetic analysis of ribosomal DNA of glass sponges (Porifera: Hexactinellida) including new specimens from the NE Pacific. Their study is important as it significantly increased the taxon sampling of this important deep-sea group. Unfortunately, there are several issues with these authors’ dataset assembly and choice of phylogenetic analysis methods. Furthermore, they did not consider previous literature that is highly relevant to interpretation of their results. Here I provide critically constructive comments on their paper and present an alternative analysis that utilizes established methodological techniques. I show that several of Kersken et al.’s findings and claims are unsustainable, and provide an extended discussion of the updated glass sponge phylogeny.
copCham
pubSpringer International Publishing
doi10.1007/s10750-018-3708-7