schliessen

Filtern

 

Bibliotheken

Cover Image

Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness

Qualitative content analysis as described in published literature shows conflicting opinions and unsolved issues regarding meaning and use of concepts, procedures and interpretation. This paper provides an overview of important concepts (manifest and latent content, unit of analysis, meaning unit, c... Full description

Journal Title: Nurse education today 2004, Vol.24 (2), p.105-112
Main Author: Graneheim, U.H
Other Authors: Lundman, B
Format: Electronic Article Electronic Article
Language: English
Subjects:
Concept Formation
Concepts
Content analysis
Credibility
Dependability
Humans
Interviews as Topic - methods
Latent content
Manifest content
Nursing
Nursing Research - methods
Nursing Research - standards
Nursing Research/methods/standards
Observation - methods
Qualitative content analysis
Qualitative Research
Reproducibility of Results
Transferability
Trustworthiness
Quelle: Alma/SFX Local Collection
Publisher: Scotland: Elsevier Ltd
ID: ISSN: 0260-6917
Zum Text:
SendSend as email Add to Book BagAdd to Book Bag
Staff View
recordid: cdi_swepub_primary_oai_DiVA_org_umu_6688
title: Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness
format: Article
creator:
  • Graneheim, U.H
  • Lundman, B
subjects:
  • Concept Formation
  • Concepts
  • Content analysis
  • Credibility
  • Dependability
  • Humans
  • Interviews as Topic - methods
  • Latent content
  • Manifest content
  • Nursing
  • Nursing Research - methods
  • Nursing Research - standards
  • Nursing Research/methods/standards
  • Observation - methods
  • Qualitative content analysis
  • Qualitative Research
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Transferability
  • Trustworthiness
ispartof: Nurse education today, 2004, Vol.24 (2), p.105-112
description: Qualitative content analysis as described in published literature shows conflicting opinions and unsolved issues regarding meaning and use of concepts, procedures and interpretation. This paper provides an overview of important concepts (manifest and latent content, unit of analysis, meaning unit, condensation, abstraction, content area, code, category and theme) related to qualitative content analysis; illustrates the use of concepts related to the research procedure; and proposes measures to achieve trustworthiness (credibility, dependability and transferability) throughout the steps of the research procedure. Interpretation in qualitative content analysis is discussed in light of Watzlawick et al.’s [Pragmatics of Human Communication. A Study of Interactional Patterns, Pathologies and Paradoxes. W.W. Norton & Company, New York, London] theory of communication.
language: eng
source: Alma/SFX Local Collection
identifier: ISSN: 0260-6917
fulltext: fulltext
issn:
  • 0260-6917
  • 1532-2793
url: Link


@attributes
NO1
SEARCH_ENGINEprimo_central_multiple_fe
SEARCH_ENGINE_TYPEPrimo Central Search Engine
RANK2.6032567
LOCALfalse
PrimoNMBib
record
control
sourceidproquest_swepu
recordidTN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_DiVA_org_umu_6688
sourceformatXML
sourcesystemPC
sourcerecordid80148703
originalsourceidFETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-a70bd6c3f9dbec133b0c580735bc7d1d7f8606587e08d4e6791d820cd693537e3
addsrcrecordideNqFkV1rFDEUhoModlv9A17IXOmFznqSzCQZ8aa0fkFBBPU2ZJKz3SyzM9t8tPTfm-kuCl6sVyEnz_tywkPICwpLClS82yxHdGnJAHgZLAHoI7KgLWc1kx1_TBbABNSio_KEnMa4AQAlGX9KTmgjRde0zYKM37MZfDLJ32JlpzHhmCozmuE--lj5sRpziH68rgJGNMGu38-UxV2Kb6tdmCy6XJ5KxFVbNPHhkqbK2LXHUplCjuluCmntR4zxGXmyMkPE54fzjPz89PHHxZf66tvnrxfnV7VtGpZqI6F3wvJV53q0lPMebKtA8ra30lEnV0qAaJVEUK5BITvqFAPrRMdbLpGfkTf73niHu9zrXfBbE-71ZLy-9L_O9RSudd5mLYRShX61p8uHbjLGpLc-WhwGM-KUo1ZAGyWBF_D1UVCKhlGm6P8rW0l5V3wUkO1BG6YYA67-7EpBz5r1Rs-a9ax5nhXNJfTy0J77Lbq_kYPXAqh_Wu2D5CI4GD8c7_6wj2Lxc-sx6Gg9FuXOB7RJu8kfi_8G9LjOJQ
sourcetypeOpen Access Repository
isCDItrue
recordtypearticle
pqid57139008
display
typearticle
titleQualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness
sourceAlma/SFX Local Collection
creatorGraneheim, U.H ; Lundman, B
creatorcontribGraneheim, U.H ; Lundman, B
descriptionQualitative content analysis as described in published literature shows conflicting opinions and unsolved issues regarding meaning and use of concepts, procedures and interpretation. This paper provides an overview of important concepts (manifest and latent content, unit of analysis, meaning unit, condensation, abstraction, content area, code, category and theme) related to qualitative content analysis; illustrates the use of concepts related to the research procedure; and proposes measures to achieve trustworthiness (credibility, dependability and transferability) throughout the steps of the research procedure. Interpretation in qualitative content analysis is discussed in light of Watzlawick et al.’s [Pragmatics of Human Communication. A Study of Interactional Patterns, Pathologies and Paradoxes. W.W. Norton & Company, New York, London] theory of communication.
identifier
0ISSN: 0260-6917
1EISSN: 1532-2793
2DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001
3PMID: 14769454
languageeng
publisherScotland: Elsevier Ltd
subjectConcept Formation ; Concepts ; Content analysis ; Credibility ; Dependability ; Humans ; Interviews as Topic - methods ; Latent content ; Manifest content ; Nursing ; Nursing Research - methods ; Nursing Research - standards ; Nursing Research/methods/standards ; Observation - methods ; Qualitative content analysis ; Qualitative Research ; Reproducibility of Results ; Transferability ; Trustworthiness
ispartofNurse education today, 2004, Vol.24 (2), p.105-112
rights2003 Elsevier Ltd
lds50peer_reviewed
citedbyFETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-a70bd6c3f9dbec133b0c580735bc7d1d7f8606587e08d4e6791d820cd693537e3
citesFETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-a70bd6c3f9dbec133b0c580735bc7d1d7f8606587e08d4e6791d820cd693537e3
links
openurl$$Topenurl_article
openurlfulltext$$Topenurlfull_article
thumbnail$$Usyndetics_thumb_exl
backlink
0$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14769454$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
1$$Uhttp://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-6688$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index
search
creatorcontrib
0Graneheim, U.H
1Lundman, B
title
0Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness
1Nurse education today
addtitleNurse Educ Today
descriptionQualitative content analysis as described in published literature shows conflicting opinions and unsolved issues regarding meaning and use of concepts, procedures and interpretation. This paper provides an overview of important concepts (manifest and latent content, unit of analysis, meaning unit, condensation, abstraction, content area, code, category and theme) related to qualitative content analysis; illustrates the use of concepts related to the research procedure; and proposes measures to achieve trustworthiness (credibility, dependability and transferability) throughout the steps of the research procedure. Interpretation in qualitative content analysis is discussed in light of Watzlawick et al.’s [Pragmatics of Human Communication. A Study of Interactional Patterns, Pathologies and Paradoxes. W.W. Norton & Company, New York, London] theory of communication.
subject
0Concept Formation
1Concepts
2Content analysis
3Credibility
4Dependability
5Humans
6Interviews as Topic - methods
7Latent content
8Manifest content
9Nursing
10Nursing Research - methods
11Nursing Research - standards
12Nursing Research/methods/standards
13Observation - methods
14Qualitative content analysis
15Qualitative Research
16Reproducibility of Results
17Transferability
18Trustworthiness
issn
00260-6917
11532-2793
fulltexttrue
rsrctypearticle
creationdate2004
recordtypearticle
recordideNqFkV1rFDEUhoModlv9A17IXOmFznqSzCQZ8aa0fkFBBPU2ZJKz3SyzM9t8tPTfm-kuCl6sVyEnz_tywkPICwpLClS82yxHdGnJAHgZLAHoI7KgLWc1kx1_TBbABNSio_KEnMa4AQAlGX9KTmgjRde0zYKM37MZfDLJ32JlpzHhmCozmuE--lj5sRpziH68rgJGNMGu38-UxV2Kb6tdmCy6XJ5KxFVbNPHhkqbK2LXHUplCjuluCmntR4zxGXmyMkPE54fzjPz89PHHxZf66tvnrxfnV7VtGpZqI6F3wvJV53q0lPMebKtA8ra30lEnV0qAaJVEUK5BITvqFAPrRMdbLpGfkTf73niHu9zrXfBbE-71ZLy-9L_O9RSudd5mLYRShX61p8uHbjLGpLc-WhwGM-KUo1ZAGyWBF_D1UVCKhlGm6P8rW0l5V3wUkO1BG6YYA67-7EpBz5r1Rs-a9ax5nhXNJfTy0J77Lbq_kYPXAqh_Wu2D5CI4GD8c7_6wj2Lxc-sx6Gg9FuXOB7RJu8kfi_8G9LjOJQ
startdate2004
enddate2004
creator
0Graneheim, U.H
1Lundman, B
generalElsevier Ltd
scope
0CGR
1CUY
2CVF
3ECM
4EIF
5NPM
6AAYXX
7CITATION
87QJ
9ASE
10FPQ
11K6X
127X8
13ADTPV
14AOWAS
sort
creationdate2004
titleQualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness
authorGraneheim, U.H ; Lundman, B
facets
frbrtype5
frbrgroupidcdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-a70bd6c3f9dbec133b0c580735bc7d1d7f8606587e08d4e6791d820cd693537e3
rsrctypearticles
prefilterarticles
languageeng
creationdate2004
topic
0Concept Formation
1Concepts
2Content analysis
3Credibility
4Dependability
5Humans
6Interviews as Topic - methods
7Latent content
8Manifest content
9Nursing
10Nursing Research - methods
11Nursing Research - standards
12Nursing Research/methods/standards
13Observation - methods
14Qualitative content analysis
15Qualitative Research
16Reproducibility of Results
17Transferability
18Trustworthiness
toplevel
0peer_reviewed
1online_resources
creatorcontrib
0Graneheim, U.H
1Lundman, B
collection
0Medline
1MEDLINE
2MEDLINE (Ovid)
3MEDLINE
4MEDLINE
5PubMed
6CrossRef
7Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
8British Nursing Index
9British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)
10British Nursing Index
11MEDLINE - Academic
12SwePub
13SwePub Articles
jtitleNurse education today
delivery
delcategoryRemote Search Resource
fulltextfulltext
addata
au
0Graneheim, U.H
1Lundman, B
formatjournal
genrearticle
ristypeJOUR
atitleQualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness
jtitleNurse education today
addtitleNurse Educ Today
date2004
risdate2004
volume24
issue2
spage105
epage112
pages105-112
issn0260-6917
eissn1532-2793
abstractQualitative content analysis as described in published literature shows conflicting opinions and unsolved issues regarding meaning and use of concepts, procedures and interpretation. This paper provides an overview of important concepts (manifest and latent content, unit of analysis, meaning unit, condensation, abstraction, content area, code, category and theme) related to qualitative content analysis; illustrates the use of concepts related to the research procedure; and proposes measures to achieve trustworthiness (credibility, dependability and transferability) throughout the steps of the research procedure. Interpretation in qualitative content analysis is discussed in light of Watzlawick et al.’s [Pragmatics of Human Communication. A Study of Interactional Patterns, Pathologies and Paradoxes. W.W. Norton & Company, New York, London] theory of communication.
copScotland
pubElsevier Ltd
pmid14769454
doi10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001