schliessen

Filtern

 

Bibliotheken

Cervical priming with misoprostol before manual vacuum aspiration versus electric vacuum aspiration for first-trimester surgical abortion

To compare the efficacy of manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) with electric vacuum aspiration (EVA) and to evaluate whether cervical priming with misoprostol facilitates cervical dilation and reduces complications associated with first-trimester medical abortion performed up to 10 weeks of pregnancy. A... Full description

Journal Title: International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2011, Vol.112(1), pp.34-39
Main Author: Mittal, Suneeta
Other Authors: Sehgal, Rohini , Aggarwal, Sagarika , Aruna, Janaki , Bahadur, Anupama , Kumar, Guresh
Format: Electronic Article Electronic Article
Language: English
Subjects:
ID: ISSN: 0020-7292 ; E-ISSN: 1879-3479 ; DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.07.035
Link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020729210005138
Zum Text:
SendSend as email Add to Book BagAdd to Book Bag
Staff View
recordid: elsevier_sdoi_10_1016_j_ijgo_2010_07_035
title: Cervical priming with misoprostol before manual vacuum aspiration versus electric vacuum aspiration for first-trimester surgical abortion
format: Article
creator:
  • Mittal, Suneeta
  • Sehgal, Rohini
  • Aggarwal, Sagarika
  • Aruna, Janaki
  • Bahadur, Anupama
  • Kumar, Guresh
subjects:
  • Electric Vacuum Aspiration
  • Induced Abortion
  • Manual Vacuum Aspiration
  • Misoprostol
  • Medicine
ispartof: International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2011, Vol.112(1), pp.34-39
description: To compare the efficacy of manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) with electric vacuum aspiration (EVA) and to evaluate whether cervical priming with misoprostol facilitates cervical dilation and reduces complications associated with first-trimester medical abortion performed up to 10 weeks of pregnancy. A total of 600 women who requested termination of pregnancy were randomized into 4 groups (150 women in each group). Group I and II received a vaginal placebo 3 hours before MVA or EVA, respectively. Group III and IV received 400 μg of vaginal misoprostol 3 hours before MVA or EVA, respectively. Complete abortion rates after MVA and EVA were both 97.9%; after cervical priming with misoprostol complete abortion rates were 98.6% versus 97.3% after cervical priming with placebo ( > 0.05)....
language: eng
source:
identifier: ISSN: 0020-7292 ; E-ISSN: 1879-3479 ; DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.07.035
fulltext: fulltext
issn:
  • 0020-7292
  • 00207292
  • 1879-3479
  • 18793479
url: Link


@attributes
ID662968867
RANK0.07
NO1
SEARCH_ENGINEprimo_central_multiple_fe
SEARCH_ENGINE_TYPEPrimo Central Search Engine
LOCALfalse
PrimoNMBib
record
control
sourcerecordiddoi_10_1016_j_ijgo_2010_07_035
sourceidelsevier_s
recordidTN_elsevier_sdoi_10_1016_j_ijgo_2010_07_035
sourcesystemPC
dbid
0--K
1.~1
20SF
31B1
41P~
51RT
61~.
7457
84G.
97-5
108P~
119JM
12AABNK
13AAQFI
14ABBQC
15ACIUM
16AEKER
17AEVXI
18AGHFR
19AGYEJ
20AHHHB
21AITUG
22AJOXV
23AJRQY
24BLXMC
25EO8
26EO9
27EP2
28EP3
29FDB
30FGOYB
31FIRID
32FNPLU
33G-Q
34GBLVA
35HEC
36HMK
37HMO
38J1W
39LCYCR
40OAUVE
41P-8
42P-9
43PC.
44Q38
45R2-
46RPZ
47SAE
48SCC
49SDF
50SDG
51SDP
52SEL
53SES
54SEW
55SSZ
pqid821595061
galeid244294551
display
typearticle
titleCervical priming with misoprostol before manual vacuum aspiration versus electric vacuum aspiration for first-trimester surgical abortion
creatorMittal, Suneeta ; Sehgal, Rohini ; Aggarwal, Sagarika ; Aruna, Janaki ; Bahadur, Anupama ; Kumar, Guresh
ispartofInternational Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2011, Vol.112(1), pp.34-39
identifier
subjectElectric Vacuum Aspiration ; Induced Abortion ; Manual Vacuum Aspiration ; Misoprostol ; Medicine
descriptionTo compare the efficacy of manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) with electric vacuum aspiration (EVA) and to evaluate whether cervical priming with misoprostol facilitates cervical dilation and reduces complications associated with first-trimester medical abortion performed up to 10 weeks of pregnancy. A total of 600 women who requested termination of pregnancy were randomized into 4 groups (150 women in each group). Group I and II received a vaginal placebo 3 hours before MVA or EVA, respectively. Group III and IV received 400 μg of vaginal misoprostol 3 hours before MVA or EVA, respectively. Complete abortion rates after MVA and EVA were both 97.9%; after cervical priming with misoprostol complete abortion rates were 98.6% versus 97.3% after cervical priming with placebo ( > 0.05)....
languageeng
source
version6
lds50peer_reviewed
links
openurl$$Topenurl_article
openurlfulltext$$Topenurlfull_article
backlink$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020729210005138$$EView_record_in_ScienceDirect_(Access_to_full_text_may_be_restricted)
search
creatorcontrib
0Mittal, Suneeta
1Sehgal, Rohini
2Aggarwal, Sagarika
3Aruna, Janaki
4Bahadur, Anupama
5Kumar, Guresh
titleCervical priming with misoprostol before manual vacuum aspiration versus electric vacuum aspiration for first-trimester surgical abortion
description
subject
0Electric Vacuum Aspiration
1Induced Abortion
2Manual Vacuum Aspiration
3Misoprostol
4Medicine
general
0English
1Elsevier Ireland Ltd
210.1016/j.ijgo.2010.07.035
3ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
4ScienceDirect Journals (Elsevier)
sourceidelsevier_s
recordidelsevier_sdoi_10_1016_j_ijgo_2010_07_035
issn
00020-7292
100207292
21879-3479
318793479
rsrctypearticle
creationdate2011
addtitleInternational Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics
searchscope
0elsevier_full
1elsevier2
scope
0elsevier_full
1elsevier2
lsr44$$EView_record_in_ScienceDirect_(Access_to_full_text_may_be_restricted)
tmp01ScienceDirect Journals (Elsevier)
tmp02
0--K
1.~1
20SF
31B1
41P~
51RT
61~.
7457
84G.
97-5
108P~
119JM
12AABNK
13AAQFI
14ABBQC
15ACIUM
16AEKER
17AEVXI
18AGHFR
19AGYEJ
20AHHHB
21AITUG
22AJOXV
23AJRQY
24BLXMC
25EO8
26EO9
27EP2
28EP3
29FDB
30FGOYB
31FIRID
32FNPLU
33G-Q
34GBLVA
35HEC
36HMK
37HMO
38J1W
39LCYCR
40OAUVE
41P-8
42P-9
43PC.
44Q38
45R2-
46RPZ
47SAE
48SCC
49SDF
50SDG
51SDP
52SEL
53SES
54SEW
55SSZ
startdate20110101
enddate20111231
lsr40International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2011, Vol.112 (1), pp.34-39
doi10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.07.035
citationpf 34 pt 39 vol 112 issue 1
lsr30VSR-Enriched:[pqid, galeid]
sort
titleCervical priming with misoprostol before manual vacuum aspiration versus electric vacuum aspiration for first-trimester surgical abortion
authorMittal, Suneeta ; Sehgal, Rohini ; Aggarwal, Sagarika ; Aruna, Janaki ; Bahadur, Anupama ; Kumar, Guresh
creationdate20110000
lso0120110000
facets
frbrgroupid8299059187976389235
frbrtype5
newrecords20190904
languageeng
topic
0Electric Vacuum Aspiration
1Induced Abortion
2Manual Vacuum Aspiration
3Misoprostol
4Medicine
collectionScienceDirect (Elsevier)
prefilterarticles
rsrctypearticles
creatorcontrib
0Mittal, Suneeta
1Sehgal, Rohini
2Aggarwal, Sagarika
3Aruna, Janaki
4Bahadur, Anupama
5Kumar, Guresh
jtitleInternational Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics
creationdate2011
toplevelpeer_reviewed
delivery
delcategoryRemote Search Resource
fulltextfulltext
addata
aulast
0Mittal
1Sehgal
2Aggarwal
3Aruna
4Bahadur
5Kumar
aufirst
0Suneeta
1Rohini
2Sagarika
3Janaki
4Anupama
5Guresh
auinitS
auinit1S
au
0Mittal, Suneeta
1Sehgal, Rohini
2Aggarwal, Sagarika
3Aruna, Janaki
4Bahadur, Anupama
5Kumar, Guresh
atitleCervical priming with misoprostol before manual vacuum aspiration versus electric vacuum aspiration for first-trimester surgical abortion
jtitleInternational Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics
date2011
risdate2011
volume112
issue1
spage34
epage39
pages34-39
issn0020-7292
eissn1879-3479
formatjournal
genrearticle
ristypeJOUR
abstract
pubElsevier Ireland Ltd
doi10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.07.035
lad01International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics