schliessen

Filtern

 

Bibliotheken

Identifying the domains of context important to implementation science: a study protocol

There is growing recognition that "context" can and does modify the effects of implementation interventions aimed at increasing healthcare professionals' use of research evidence in clinical practice. However, conceptual clarity about what exactly comprises "context" is lacking. The purpose of this... Full description

Journal Title: Implementation science : IS 28 September 2015, Vol.10, pp.135
Main Author: Squires, Janet E
Other Authors: Graham, Ian D , Hutchinson, Alison M , Michie, Susan , Francis, Jill J , Sales, Anne , Brehaut, Jamie , Curran, Janet , Ivers, Noah , Lavis, John , Linklater, Stefanie , Fenton, Shannon , Noseworthy, Thomas , Vine, Jocelyn , Grimshaw, Jeremy M
Format: Electronic Article Electronic Article
Language: English
Subjects:
ID: E-ISSN: 1748-5908 ; PMID: 26416206 Version:1 ; DOI: 10.1186/s13012-015-0325-y
Link: http://pubmed.gov/26416206
Zum Text:
SendSend as email Add to Book BagAdd to Book Bag
Staff View
recordid: medline26416206
title: Identifying the domains of context important to implementation science: a study protocol
format: Article
creator:
  • Squires, Janet E
  • Graham, Ian D
  • Hutchinson, Alison M
  • Michie, Susan
  • Francis, Jill J
  • Sales, Anne
  • Brehaut, Jamie
  • Curran, Janet
  • Ivers, Noah
  • Lavis, John
  • Linklater, Stefanie
  • Fenton, Shannon
  • Noseworthy, Thomas
  • Vine, Jocelyn
  • Grimshaw, Jeremy M
subjects:
  • Attitude of Health Personnel
  • Diffusion of Innovation
  • Research Design
  • Evidence-Based Medicine -- Organization & Administration
  • Health Personnel -- Organization & Administration
ispartof: Implementation science : IS, 28 September 2015, Vol.10, pp.135
description: There is growing recognition that "context" can and does modify the effects of implementation interventions aimed at increasing healthcare professionals' use of research evidence in clinical practice. However, conceptual clarity about what exactly comprises "context" is lacking. The purpose of this research program is to develop, refine, and validate a framework that identifies the key domains of context (and their features) that can facilitate or hinder (1) healthcare professionals' use of evidence in clinical practice and (2) the effectiveness of implementation interventions. A multi-phased investigation of context using mixed methods will be conducted. The first phase is a concept analysis of context using the Walker and Avant method to distinguish between the defining and irrelevant attributes of context. This phase will result in a preliminary framework for context that identifies its important domains and their features according to the published literature. The second phase is a secondary analysis of qualitative data from 13 studies of interviews with 312 healthcare professionals on the perceived barriers and enablers to their application of research evidence in clinical practice. These data will be analyzed inductively using constant comparative analysis. For the third phase, we will conduct semi-structured interviews with key health system stakeholders and change agents to elicit their knowledge and beliefs about the contextual features that influence the effectiveness of implementation interventions and healthcare professionals' use of evidence in clinical practice. Results from all three phases will be synthesized using a triangulation protocol to refine the context framework drawn from the concept analysis. The framework will then be assessed for content validity using an iterative Delphi approach with international experts (researchers and health system stakeholders/change agents). This research program will result in a framework that identifies the domains of context and their features that can facilitate or hinder: (1) healthcare professionals' use of evidence in clinical practice and (2) the effectiveness of implementation interventions. The framework will increase the conceptual clarity of the term "context" for advancing implementation science, improving healthcare professionals' use of evidence in clinical practice, and providing greater understanding of what interventions are likely to be effective in which contexts.
language: eng
source:
identifier: E-ISSN: 1748-5908 ; PMID: 26416206 Version:1 ; DOI: 10.1186/s13012-015-0325-y
fulltext: fulltext
issn:
  • 17485908
  • 1748-5908
url: Link


@attributes
ID1686369858
RANK0.07
NO1
SEARCH_ENGINEprimo_central_multiple_fe
SEARCH_ENGINE_TYPEPrimo Central Search Engine
LOCALfalse
PrimoNMBib
record
control
sourcerecordid26416206
sourceidmedline
recordidTN_medline26416206
sourceformatXML
sourcesystemOther
pqid1718074618
galeid541557020
display
typearticle
titleIdentifying the domains of context important to implementation science: a study protocol
creatorSquires, Janet E ; Graham, Ian D ; Hutchinson, Alison M ; Michie, Susan ; Francis, Jill J ; Sales, Anne ; Brehaut, Jamie ; Curran, Janet ; Ivers, Noah ; Lavis, John ; Linklater, Stefanie ; Fenton, Shannon ; Noseworthy, Thomas ; Vine, Jocelyn ; Grimshaw, Jeremy M
ispartofImplementation science : IS, 28 September 2015, Vol.10, pp.135
identifier
subjectAttitude of Health Personnel ; Diffusion of Innovation ; Research Design ; Evidence-Based Medicine -- Organization & Administration ; Health Personnel -- Organization & Administration
descriptionThere is growing recognition that "context" can and does modify the effects of implementation interventions aimed at increasing healthcare professionals' use of research evidence in clinical practice. However, conceptual clarity about what exactly comprises "context" is lacking. The purpose of this research program is to develop, refine, and validate a framework that identifies the key domains of context (and their features) that can facilitate or hinder (1) healthcare professionals' use of evidence in clinical practice and (2) the effectiveness of implementation interventions. A multi-phased investigation of context using mixed methods will be conducted. The first phase is a concept analysis of context using the Walker and Avant method to distinguish between the defining and irrelevant attributes of context. This phase will result in a preliminary framework for context that identifies its important domains and their features according to the published literature. The second phase is a secondary analysis of qualitative data from 13 studies of interviews with 312 healthcare professionals on the perceived barriers and enablers to their application of research evidence in clinical practice. These data will be analyzed inductively using constant comparative analysis. For the third phase, we will conduct semi-structured interviews with key health system stakeholders and change agents to elicit their knowledge and beliefs about the contextual features that influence the effectiveness of implementation interventions and healthcare professionals' use of evidence in clinical practice. Results from all three phases will be synthesized using a triangulation protocol to refine the context framework drawn from the concept analysis. The framework will then be assessed for content validity using an iterative Delphi approach with international experts (researchers and health system stakeholders/change agents). This research program will result in a framework that identifies the domains of context and their features that can facilitate or hinder: (1) healthcare professionals' use of evidence in clinical practice and (2) the effectiveness of implementation interventions. The framework will increase the conceptual clarity of the term "context" for advancing implementation science, improving healthcare professionals' use of evidence in clinical practice, and providing greater understanding of what interventions are likely to be effective in which contexts.
languageeng
source
version5
lds50peer_reviewed
links
openurl$$Topenurl_article
backlink$$Uhttp://pubmed.gov/26416206$$EView_this_record_in_MEDLINE/PubMed
openurlfulltext$$Topenurlfull_article
addlink$$Uhttp://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/aboutMedline.html$$EView_the_MEDLINE/PubMed_Copyright_Statement
search
creatorcontrib
0Squires, Janet E
1Graham, Ian D
2Hutchinson, Alison M
3Michie, Susan
4Francis, Jill J
5Sales, Anne
6Brehaut, Jamie
7Curran, Janet
8Ivers, Noah
9Lavis, John
10Linklater, Stefanie
11Fenton, Shannon
12Noseworthy, Thomas
13Vine, Jocelyn
14Grimshaw, Jeremy M
titleIdentifying the domains of context important to implementation science: a study protocol
description
0There is growing recognition that "context" can and does modify the effects of implementation interventions aimed at increasing healthcare professionals' use of research evidence in clinical practice. However, conceptual clarity about what exactly comprises "context" is lacking. The purpose of this research program is to develop, refine, and validate a framework that identifies the key domains of context (and their features) that can facilitate or hinder (1) healthcare professionals' use of evidence in clinical practice and (2) the effectiveness of implementation interventions.
1A multi-phased investigation of context using mixed methods will be conducted. The first phase is a concept analysis of context using the Walker and Avant method to distinguish between the defining and irrelevant attributes of context. This phase will result in a preliminary framework for context that identifies its important domains and their features according to the published literature. The second phase is a secondary analysis of qualitative data from 13 studies of interviews with 312 healthcare professionals on the perceived barriers and enablers to their application of research evidence in clinical practice. These data will be analyzed inductively using constant comparative analysis. For the third phase, we will conduct semi-structured interviews with key health system stakeholders and change agents to elicit their knowledge and beliefs about the contextual features that influence the effectiveness of implementation interventions and healthcare professionals' use of evidence in clinical practice. Results from all three phases will be synthesized using a triangulation protocol to refine the context framework drawn from the concept analysis. The framework will then be assessed for content validity using an iterative Delphi approach with international experts (researchers and health system stakeholders/change agents).
2This research program will result in a framework that identifies the domains of context and their features that can facilitate or hinder: (1) healthcare professionals' use of evidence in clinical practice and (2) the effectiveness of implementation interventions. The framework will increase the conceptual clarity of the term "context" for advancing implementation science, improving healthcare professionals' use of evidence in clinical practice, and providing greater understanding of what interventions are likely to be effective in which contexts.
subject
0Attitude of Health Personnel
1Diffusion of Innovation
2Research Design
3Evidence-Based Medicine -- Organization & Administration
4Health Personnel -- Organization & Administration
general
026416206
1English
2MEDLINE/PubMed (U.S. National Library of Medicine)
310.1186/s13012-015-0325-y
4MEDLINE/PubMed (NLM)
sourceidmedline
recordidmedline26416206
issn
017485908
11748-5908
rsrctypearticle
creationdate2015
addtitleImplementation science : IS
searchscope
0medline
1nlm_medline
2MEDLINE
scope
0medline
1nlm_medline
2MEDLINE
lsr4120150928
citationpf 135 vol 10
startdate20150928
enddate20150928
lsr30VSR-Enriched:[pqid, galeid, issue]
sort
titleIdentifying the domains of context important to implementation science: a study protocol
authorSquires, Janet E ; Graham, Ian D ; Hutchinson, Alison M ; Michie, Susan ; Francis, Jill J ; Sales, Anne ; Brehaut, Jamie ; Curran, Janet ; Ivers, Noah ; Lavis, John ; Linklater, Stefanie ; Fenton, Shannon ; Noseworthy, Thomas ; Vine, Jocelyn ; Grimshaw, Jeremy M
creationdate20150928
lso0120150928
facets
frbrgroupid2649951501770142740
frbrtype5
newrecords20190701
languageeng
creationdate2015
topic
0Attitude of Health Personnel
1Diffusion of Innovation
2Research Design
3Evidence-Based Medicine–Organization & Administration
4Health Personnel–Organization & Administration
collectionMEDLINE/PubMed (NLM)
prefilterarticles
rsrctypearticles
creatorcontrib
0Squires, Janet E
1Graham, Ian D
2Hutchinson, Alison M
3Michie, Susan
4Francis, Jill J
5Sales, Anne
6Brehaut, Jamie
7Curran, Janet
8Ivers, Noah
9Lavis, John
10Linklater, Stefanie
11Fenton, Shannon
12Noseworthy, Thomas
13Vine, Jocelyn
14Grimshaw, Jeremy M
jtitleImplementation Science : Is
toplevelpeer_reviewed
delivery
delcategoryRemote Search Resource
fulltextfulltext
addata
aulast
0Squires
1Graham
2Hutchinson
3Michie
4Francis
5Sales
6Brehaut
7Curran
8Ivers
9Lavis
10Linklater
11Fenton
12Noseworthy
13Vine
14Grimshaw
aufirst
0Janet E
1Ian D
2Alison M
3Susan
4Jill J
5Anne
6Jamie
7Janet
8Noah
9John
10Stefanie
11Shannon
12Thomas
13Jocelyn
14Jeremy M
au
0Squires, Janet E
1Graham, Ian D
2Hutchinson, Alison M
3Michie, Susan
4Francis, Jill J
5Sales, Anne
6Brehaut, Jamie
7Curran, Janet
8Ivers, Noah
9Lavis, John
10Linklater, Stefanie
11Fenton, Shannon
12Noseworthy, Thomas
13Vine, Jocelyn
14Grimshaw, Jeremy M
atitleIdentifying the domains of context important to implementation science: a study protocol
jtitleImplementation science : IS
risdate20150928
volume10
spage135
pages135
eissn1748-5908
formatjournal
genrearticle
ristypeJOUR
abstractThere is growing recognition that "context" can and does modify the effects of implementation interventions aimed at increasing healthcare professionals' use of research evidence in clinical practice. However, conceptual clarity about what exactly comprises "context" is lacking. The purpose of this research program is to develop, refine, and validate a framework that identifies the key domains of context (and their features) that can facilitate or hinder (1) healthcare professionals' use of evidence in clinical practice and (2) the effectiveness of implementation interventions.
doi10.1186/s13012-015-0325-y
pmid26416206
issue1
oafree_for_read
date2015-09-28