schliessen

Filtern

 

Bibliotheken

Methods for designing interventions to change healthcare professionals' behaviour: a systematic review

Systematic reviews consistently indicate that interventions to change healthcare professional (HCP) behaviour are haphazardly designed and poorly specified. Clarity about methods for designing and specifying interventions is needed. The objective of this review was to identify published methods for... Full description

Journal Title: Implementation science : IS 04 March 2017, Vol.12(1), pp.30
Main Author: Colquhoun, Heather L
Other Authors: Squires, Janet E , Kolehmainen, Niina , Fraser, Cynthia , Grimshaw, Jeremy M
Format: Electronic Article Electronic Article
Language: English
Subjects:
ID: E-ISSN: 1748-5908 ; PMID: 28259168 Version:1 ; DOI: 10.1186/s13012-017-0560-5
Link: http://pubmed.gov/28259168
Zum Text:
SendSend as email Add to Book BagAdd to Book Bag
Staff View
recordid: medline28259168
title: Methods for designing interventions to change healthcare professionals' behaviour: a systematic review
format: Article
creator:
  • Colquhoun, Heather L
  • Squires, Janet E
  • Kolehmainen, Niina
  • Fraser, Cynthia
  • Grimshaw, Jeremy M
subjects:
  • Intervention Design
  • Knowledge Translation
  • Methodology
  • Systematic Review
  • Health Personnel -- Standards
  • Professional Practice -- Standards
ispartof: Implementation science : IS, 04 March 2017, Vol.12(1), pp.30
description: Systematic reviews consistently indicate that interventions to change healthcare professional (HCP) behaviour are haphazardly designed and poorly specified. Clarity about methods for designing and specifying interventions is needed. The objective of this review was to identify published methods for designing interventions to change HCP behaviour. A search of MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO was conducted from 1996 to April 2015. Using inclusion/exclusion criteria, a broad screen of abstracts by one rater was followed by a strict screen of full text for all potentially relevant papers by three raters. An inductive approach was first applied to the included studies to identify commonalities and differences between the descriptions of methods across the papers. Based on this process and knowledge of related literatures, we developed a data extraction framework that included, e.g. level of change (e.g. individual versus organization); context of development; a brief description of the method; tasks included in the method (e.g. barrier identification, component selection, use of theory). 3966 titles and abstracts and 64 full-text papers were screened to yield 15 papers included in the review, each outlining one design method. All of the papers reported methods developed within a specific context. Thirteen papers included barrier identification and 13 included linking barriers to intervention components; although not the same 13 papers. Thirteen papers targeted individual HCPs with only one paper targeting change across individual, organization, and system levels. The use of theory and user engagement were included in 13/15 and 13/15 papers, respectively. There is an agreement across methods of four tasks that need to be completed when designing individual-level interventions: identifying barriers, selecting intervention components, using theory, and engaging end-users. Methods also consist of further additional tasks. Examples of methods for designing the organisation and system-level interventions were limited. Further analysis of design tasks could facilitate the development of detailed guidelines for designing interventions.
language: eng
source:
identifier: E-ISSN: 1748-5908 ; PMID: 28259168 Version:1 ; DOI: 10.1186/s13012-017-0560-5
fulltext: fulltext
issn:
  • 17485908
  • 1748-5908
url: Link


@attributes
ID1289340333
RANK0.07
NO1
SEARCH_ENGINEprimo_central_multiple_fe
SEARCH_ENGINE_TYPEPrimo Central Search Engine
LOCALfalse
PrimoNMBib
record
control
sourcerecordid28259168
sourceidmedline
recordidTN_medline28259168
sourceformatXML
sourcesystemOther
pqid1874782383
display
typearticle
titleMethods for designing interventions to change healthcare professionals' behaviour: a systematic review
creatorColquhoun, Heather L ; Squires, Janet E ; Kolehmainen, Niina ; Fraser, Cynthia ; Grimshaw, Jeremy M
ispartofImplementation science : IS, 04 March 2017, Vol.12(1), pp.30
identifier
subjectIntervention Design ; Knowledge Translation ; Methodology ; Systematic Review ; Health Personnel -- Standards ; Professional Practice -- Standards
descriptionSystematic reviews consistently indicate that interventions to change healthcare professional (HCP) behaviour are haphazardly designed and poorly specified. Clarity about methods for designing and specifying interventions is needed. The objective of this review was to identify published methods for designing interventions to change HCP behaviour. A search of MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO was conducted from 1996 to April 2015. Using inclusion/exclusion criteria, a broad screen of abstracts by one rater was followed by a strict screen of full text for all potentially relevant papers by three raters. An inductive approach was first applied to the included studies to identify commonalities and differences between the descriptions of methods across the papers. Based on this process and knowledge of related literatures, we developed a data extraction framework that included, e.g. level of change (e.g. individual versus organization); context of development; a brief description of the method; tasks included in the method (e.g. barrier identification, component selection, use of theory). 3966 titles and abstracts and 64 full-text papers were screened to yield 15 papers included in the review, each outlining one design method. All of the papers reported methods developed within a specific context. Thirteen papers included barrier identification and 13 included linking barriers to intervention components; although not the same 13 papers. Thirteen papers targeted individual HCPs with only one paper targeting change across individual, organization, and system levels. The use of theory and user engagement were included in 13/15 and 13/15 papers, respectively. There is an agreement across methods of four tasks that need to be completed when designing individual-level interventions: identifying barriers, selecting intervention components, using theory, and engaging end-users. Methods also consist of further additional tasks. Examples of methods for designing the organisation and system-level interventions were limited. Further analysis of design tasks could facilitate the development of detailed guidelines for designing interventions.
languageeng
source
version5
lds50peer_reviewed
links
openurl$$Topenurl_article
backlink$$Uhttp://pubmed.gov/28259168$$EView_this_record_in_MEDLINE/PubMed
openurlfulltext$$Topenurlfull_article
addlink$$Uhttp://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/aboutMedline.html$$EView_the_MEDLINE/PubMed_Copyright_Statement
search
creatorcontrib
0Colquhoun, Heather L
1Squires, Janet E
2Kolehmainen, Niina
3Fraser, Cynthia
4Grimshaw, Jeremy M
titleMethods for designing interventions to change healthcare professionals' behaviour: a systematic review
description
0Systematic reviews consistently indicate that interventions to change healthcare professional (HCP) behaviour are haphazardly designed and poorly specified. Clarity about methods for designing and specifying interventions is needed. The objective of this review was to identify published methods for designing interventions to change HCP behaviour.
1A search of MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO was conducted from 1996 to April 2015. Using inclusion/exclusion criteria, a broad screen of abstracts by one rater was followed by a strict screen of full text for all potentially relevant papers by three raters. An inductive approach was first applied to the included studies to identify commonalities and differences between the descriptions of methods across the papers. Based on this process and knowledge of related literatures, we developed a data extraction framework that included, e.g. level of change (e.g. individual versus organization); context of development; a brief description of the method; tasks included in the method (e.g. barrier identification, component selection, use of theory).
23966 titles and abstracts and 64 full-text papers were screened to yield 15 papers included in the review, each outlining one design method. All of the papers reported methods developed within a specific context. Thirteen papers included barrier identification and 13 included linking barriers to intervention components; although not the same 13 papers. Thirteen papers targeted individual HCPs with only one paper targeting change across individual, organization, and system levels. The use of theory and user engagement were included in 13/15 and 13/15 papers, respectively.
3There is an agreement across methods of four tasks that need to be completed when designing individual-level interventions: identifying barriers, selecting intervention components, using theory, and engaging end-users. Methods also consist of further additional tasks. Examples of methods for designing the organisation and system-level interventions were limited. Further analysis of design tasks could facilitate the development of detailed guidelines for designing interventions.
subject
0Intervention Design
1Knowledge Translation
2Methodology
3Systematic Review
4Health Personnel -- Standards
5Professional Practice -- Standards
general
028259168
1English
2MEDLINE/PubMed (U.S. National Library of Medicine)
310.1186/s13012-017-0560-5
4MEDLINE/PubMed (NLM)
sourceidmedline
recordidmedline28259168
issn
017485908
11748-5908
rsrctypearticle
creationdate2017
addtitleImplementation science : IS
searchscope
0medline
1nlm_medline
2MEDLINE
scope
0medline
1nlm_medline
2MEDLINE
lsr41201704
citationpf 30 vol 12 issue 1
startdate20170304
enddate20170304
lsr30VSR-Enriched:[pqid]
sort
titleMethods for designing interventions to change healthcare professionals' behaviour: a systematic review
authorColquhoun, Heather L ; Squires, Janet E ; Kolehmainen, Niina ; Fraser, Cynthia ; Grimshaw, Jeremy M
creationdate20170304
lso0120170304
facets
frbrgroupid4625681118554409142
frbrtype5
newrecords20190701
languageeng
creationdate2017
topic
0Intervention Design
1Knowledge Translation
2Methodology
3Systematic Review
4Health Personnel–Standards
5Professional Practice–Standards
collectionMEDLINE/PubMed (NLM)
prefilterarticles
rsrctypearticles
creatorcontrib
0Colquhoun, Heather L
1Squires, Janet E
2Kolehmainen, Niina
3Fraser, Cynthia
4Grimshaw, Jeremy M
jtitleImplementation Science : Is
toplevelpeer_reviewed
delivery
delcategoryRemote Search Resource
fulltextfulltext
addata
aulast
0Colquhoun
1Squires
2Kolehmainen
3Fraser
4Grimshaw
aufirst
0Heather L
1Janet E
2Niina
3Cynthia
4Jeremy M
au
0Colquhoun, Heather L
1Squires, Janet E
2Kolehmainen, Niina
3Fraser, Cynthia
4Grimshaw, Jeremy M
atitleMethods for designing interventions to change healthcare professionals' behaviour: a systematic review
jtitleImplementation science : IS
risdate20170304
volume12
issue1
spage30
pages30
eissn1748-5908
formatjournal
genrearticle
ristypeJOUR
abstractSystematic reviews consistently indicate that interventions to change healthcare professional (HCP) behaviour are haphazardly designed and poorly specified. Clarity about methods for designing and specifying interventions is needed. The objective of this review was to identify published methods for designing interventions to change HCP behaviour.
doi10.1186/s13012-017-0560-5
pmid28259168
oafree_for_read
date2017-03-04