schliessen

Filtern

 

Bibliotheken

Relative Validity of Nutrient Intakes Assessed by Questionnaire, 24-Hour Recalls, and Diet Records as Compared With Urinary Recovery and Plasma Concentration Biomarkers: Findings for Women

We evaluated the performance of a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire (SFFQ), the Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Dietary Recall (ASA24), and 7-day dietary records (7DDRs), in comparison with biomarkers, in the estimation of nutrient intakes among 627 women in the Women’s Lifestyle Val... Full description

Journal Title: American Journal of Epidemiology 2018, Vol. 187(5), pp.1051-1063
Main Author: Yuan, Changzheng
Other Authors: Spiegelman, Donna , Rimm, Eric B , Rosner, Bernard A , Stampfer, Meir J , Barnett, Junaidah B , Chavarro, Jorge E , Rood, Jennifer C , Harnack, Lisa J , Sampson, Laura K , Willett, Walter C
Format: Electronic Article Electronic Article
Language:
Subjects:
ID: ISSN: 0002-9262 ; E-ISSN: 1476-6256 ; DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwx328
Zum Text:
SendSend as email Add to Book BagAdd to Book Bag
Staff View
recordid: oxford10.1093/aje/kwx328
title: Relative Validity of Nutrient Intakes Assessed by Questionnaire, 24-Hour Recalls, and Diet Records as Compared With Urinary Recovery and Plasma Concentration Biomarkers: Findings for Women
format: Article
creator:
  • Yuan, Changzheng
  • Spiegelman, Donna
  • Rimm, Eric B
  • Rosner, Bernard A
  • Stampfer, Meir J
  • Barnett, Junaidah B
  • Chavarro, Jorge E
  • Rood, Jennifer C
  • Harnack, Lisa J
  • Sampson, Laura K
  • Willett, Walter C
subjects:
  • Biomarkers
  • Concentration Biomarkers
  • Diet Records
  • Food Frequency Questionnaires
  • Nutrient Intakes
  • Recall
  • Recovery Biomarkers
  • Relative Validity
ispartof: American Journal of Epidemiology, 2018, Vol. 187(5), pp.1051-1063
description: We evaluated the performance of a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire (SFFQ), the Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Dietary Recall (ASA24), and 7-day dietary records (7DDRs), in comparison with biomarkers, in the estimation of nutrient intakes among 627 women in the Women’s Lifestyle Validation Study (United States, 2010–2012). Two paper SFFQs, 1 Web-based SFFQ, 4 ASA24s (beta version), 2 7DDRs, 4 24-hour urine samples, 1 doubly labeled water measurement (repeated among 76 participants), and 2 fasting blood samples were collected over a 15-month period. The dietary variables evaluated were energy, energy-adjusted intakes of protein, sodium, potassium, and specific fatty acids, carotenoids, α-tocopherol, retinol, and folate. In general, relative to biomarkers, averaged ASA24s had lower validity than the SFFQ completed at the end of the data-collection year (SFFQ2); SFFQ2 had slightly lower validity than 1 7DDR; the averaged SFFQs had validity similar to that of 1 7DDR; and the averaged 7DDRs had the highest validity. The deattenuated correlation of energy-adjusted protein intake assessed by SFFQ2 with its biomarker was 0.46, similar to its correlation with 7DDRs (deattenuated r = 0.54). These data indicate that the SFFQ2 provides reasonably valid measurements of energy-adjusted intake for most of the nutrients assessed in our study, consistent with earlier conclusions derived using 7DDRs as the comparison method. The ASA24 needs further evaluation for use in large population studies, but an average of 3 days of measurement will not be sufficient for some important nutrients.
language:
source:
identifier: ISSN: 0002-9262 ; E-ISSN: 1476-6256 ; DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwx328
fulltext: fulltext
issn:
  • 0002-9262
  • 00029262
  • 1476-6256
  • 14766256
url: Link


@attributes
ID519506059
RANK0.07
NO1
SEARCH_ENGINEprimo_central_multiple_fe
SEARCH_ENGINE_TYPEPrimo Central Search Engine
LOCALfalse
PrimoNMBib
record
control
sourcerecordid10.1093/aje/kwx328
sourceidoxford
recordidTN_oxford10.1093/aje/kwx328
sourceformatXML
sourcesystemPC
pqid1952107989
display
typearticle
titleRelative Validity of Nutrient Intakes Assessed by Questionnaire, 24-Hour Recalls, and Diet Records as Compared With Urinary Recovery and Plasma Concentration Biomarkers: Findings for Women
creatorYuan, Changzheng ; Spiegelman, Donna ; Rimm, Eric B ; Rosner, Bernard A ; Stampfer, Meir J ; Barnett, Junaidah B ; Chavarro, Jorge E ; Rood, Jennifer C ; Harnack, Lisa J ; Sampson, Laura K ; Willett, Walter C
ispartofAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2018, Vol. 187(5), pp.1051-1063
identifier
subjectBiomarkers ; Concentration Biomarkers ; Diet Records ; Food Frequency Questionnaires ; Nutrient Intakes ; Recall ; Recovery Biomarkers ; Relative Validity
descriptionWe evaluated the performance of a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire (SFFQ), the Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Dietary Recall (ASA24), and 7-day dietary records (7DDRs), in comparison with biomarkers, in the estimation of nutrient intakes among 627 women in the Women’s Lifestyle Validation Study (United States, 2010–2012). Two paper SFFQs, 1 Web-based SFFQ, 4 ASA24s (beta version), 2 7DDRs, 4 24-hour urine samples, 1 doubly labeled water measurement (repeated among 76 participants), and 2 fasting blood samples were collected over a 15-month period. The dietary variables evaluated were energy, energy-adjusted intakes of protein, sodium, potassium, and specific fatty acids, carotenoids, α-tocopherol, retinol, and folate. In general, relative to biomarkers, averaged ASA24s had lower validity than the SFFQ completed at the end of the data-collection year (SFFQ2); SFFQ2 had slightly lower validity than 1 7DDR; the averaged SFFQs had validity similar to that of 1 7DDR; and the averaged 7DDRs had the highest validity. The deattenuated correlation of energy-adjusted protein intake assessed by SFFQ2 with its biomarker was 0.46, similar to its correlation with 7DDRs (deattenuated r = 0.54). These data indicate that the SFFQ2 provides reasonably valid measurements of energy-adjusted intake for most of the nutrients assessed in our study, consistent with earlier conclusions derived using 7DDRs as the comparison method. The ASA24 needs further evaluation for use in large population studies, but an average of 3 days of measurement will not be sufficient for some important nutrients.
source
version5
lds50peer_reviewed
links
openurl$$Topenurl_article
openurlfulltext$$Topenurlfull_article
search
creatorcontrib
0Yuan, Changzheng
1Spiegelman, Donna
2Rimm, Eric B
3Rosner, Bernard A
4Stampfer, Meir J
5Barnett, Junaidah B
6Chavarro, Jorge E
7Rood, Jennifer C
8Harnack, Lisa J
9Sampson, Laura K
10Willett, Walter C
titleRelative Validity of Nutrient Intakes Assessed by Questionnaire, 24-Hour Recalls, and Diet Records as Compared With Urinary Recovery and Plasma Concentration Biomarkers: Findings for Women
descriptionWe evaluated the performance of a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire (SFFQ), the Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Dietary Recall (ASA24), and 7-day dietary records (7DDRs), in comparison with biomarkers, in the estimation of nutrient intakes among 627 women in the Women’s Lifestyle Validation Study (United States, 2010–2012). Two paper SFFQs, 1 Web-based SFFQ, 4 ASA24s (beta version), 2 7DDRs, 4 24-hour urine samples, 1 doubly labeled water measurement (repeated among 76 participants), and 2 fasting blood samples were collected over a 15-month period. The dietary variables evaluated were energy, energy-adjusted intakes of protein, sodium, potassium, and specific fatty acids, carotenoids, α-tocopherol, retinol, and folate. In general, relative to biomarkers, averaged ASA24s had lower validity than the SFFQ completed at the end of the data-collection year (SFFQ2); SFFQ2 had slightly lower validity than 1 7DDR; the averaged SFFQs had validity similar to that of 1 7DDR; and the averaged 7DDRs had the highest validity. The deattenuated correlation of energy-adjusted protein intake assessed by SFFQ2 with its biomarker was 0.46, similar to its correlation with 7DDRs (deattenuated r = 0.54). These data indicate that the SFFQ2 provides reasonably valid measurements of energy-adjusted intake for most of the nutrients assessed in our study, consistent with earlier conclusions derived using 7DDRs as the comparison method. The ASA24 needs further evaluation for use in large population studies, but an average of 3 days of measurement will not be sufficient for some important nutrients.
subject
0biomarkers
1concentration biomarkers
2diet records
3food frequency questionnaires
4nutrient intakes
5recall
6recovery biomarkers
7relative validity
general
0kwx328
110.1093/aje/kwx328
2Oxford Journals
sourceidoxford
recordidoxford10.1093/aje/kwx328
issn
00002-9262
100029262
21476-6256
314766256
rsrctypearticle
creationdate2018
searchscopeoxford
scopeoxford
lsr4020180501
lsr4120171004
lsr30VSR-Enriched:[date, pqid]
sort
titleRelative Validity of Nutrient Intakes Assessed by Questionnaire, 24-Hour Recalls, and Diet Records as Compared With Urinary Recovery and Plasma Concentration Biomarkers: Findings for Women
authorYuan, Changzheng ; Spiegelman, Donna ; Rimm, Eric B ; Rosner, Bernard A ; Stampfer, Meir J ; Barnett, Junaidah B ; Chavarro, Jorge E ; Rood, Jennifer C ; Harnack, Lisa J ; Sampson, Laura K ; Willett, Walter C
creationdate20180500
facets
frbrgroupid5390153342264137755
frbrtype5
newrecords20190113
creationdate2018
topic
0Biomarkers
1Concentration Biomarkers
2Diet Records
3Food Frequency Questionnaires
4Nutrient Intakes
5Recall
6Recovery Biomarkers
7Relative Validity
collectionOxford Journals (Oxford University Press)
prefilterarticles
rsrctypearticles
creatorcontrib
0Yuan, Changzheng
1Spiegelman, Donna
2Rimm, Eric B
3Rosner, Bernard A
4Stampfer, Meir J
5Barnett, Junaidah B
6Chavarro, Jorge E
7Rood, Jennifer C
8Harnack, Lisa J
9Sampson, Laura K
10Willett, Walter C
jtitleAmerican Journal Of Epidemiology
toplevelpeer_reviewed
delivery
delcategoryRemote Search Resource
fulltextfulltext
addata
aulast
0Yuan
1Spiegelman
2Rimm
3Rosner
4Stampfer
5Barnett
6Chavarro
7Rood
8Harnack
9Sampson
10Willett
aufirst
0Changzheng
1Donna
2Eric B
3Bernard A
4Meir J
5Junaidah B
6Jorge E
7Jennifer C
8Lisa J
9Laura K
10Walter C
au
0Yuan, Changzheng
1Spiegelman, Donna
2Rimm, Eric B
3Rosner, Bernard A
4Stampfer, Meir J
5Barnett, Junaidah B
6Chavarro, Jorge E
7Rood, Jennifer C
8Harnack, Lisa J
9Sampson, Laura K
10Willett, Walter C
atitleRelative Validity of Nutrient Intakes Assessed by Questionnaire, 24-Hour Recalls, and Diet Records as Compared With Urinary Recovery and Plasma Concentration Biomarkers: Findings for Women
jtitleAmerican Journal of Epidemiology
risdate201805
volume187
issue5
spage1051
epage1063
pages1051-1063
issn0002-9262
eissn1476-6256
formatjournal
genrearticle
ristypeJOUR
abstractWe evaluated the performance of a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire (SFFQ), the Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Dietary Recall (ASA24), and 7-day dietary records (7DDRs), in comparison with biomarkers, in the estimation of nutrient intakes among 627 women in the Women’s Lifestyle Validation Study (United States, 2010–2012). Two paper SFFQs, 1 Web-based SFFQ, 4 ASA24s (beta version), 2 7DDRs, 4 24-hour urine samples, 1 doubly labeled water measurement (repeated among 76 participants), and 2 fasting blood samples were collected over a 15-month period. The dietary variables evaluated were energy, energy-adjusted intakes of protein, sodium, potassium, and specific fatty acids, carotenoids, α-tocopherol, retinol, and folate. In general, relative to biomarkers, averaged ASA24s had lower validity than the SFFQ completed at the end of the data-collection year (SFFQ2); SFFQ2 had slightly lower validity than 1 7DDR; the averaged SFFQs had validity similar to that of 1 7DDR; and the averaged 7DDRs had the highest validity. The deattenuated correlation of energy-adjusted protein intake assessed by SFFQ2 with its biomarker was 0.46, similar to its correlation with 7DDRs (deattenuated r = 0.54). These data indicate that the SFFQ2 provides reasonably valid measurements of energy-adjusted intake for most of the nutrients assessed in our study, consistent with earlier conclusions derived using 7DDRs as the comparison method. The ASA24 needs further evaluation for use in large population studies, but an average of 3 days of measurement will not be sufficient for some important nutrients.
pubOxford University Press
doi10.1093/aje/kwx328
date2018-05-01