schliessen

Filtern

 

Bibliotheken

Effects of front-of-package and shelf nutrition labeling systems on consumers

As standards are considered for nutrition front-of-package (FOP) and shelf-labeling systems in the United States, it is important to know what types of systems are most effective in conveying scientifically accurate and useful information to consumers. A systematic literature review identified 38 em... Full description

Journal Title: Nutrition Reviews Jan 2013, Vol.71(1), p.1
Main Author: Hersey, James
Other Authors: Wohlgenant, Kelly , Arsenault, Joanne , Kosa, Katherine , Muth, Mary
Format: Electronic Article Electronic Article
Language: English
Subjects:
ID: ISSN: 00296643
Link: http://search.proquest.com/docview/1269177711/?pq-origsite=primo
Zum Text:
SendSend as email Add to Book BagAdd to Book Bag
Staff View
recordid: proquest1269177711
title: Effects of front-of-package and shelf nutrition labeling systems on consumers
format: Article
creator:
  • Hersey, James
  • Wohlgenant, Kelly
  • Arsenault, Joanne
  • Kosa, Katherine
  • Muth, Mary
subjects:
  • United States–Us
  • Nutrition
  • Descriptive Labeling
  • Consumer Behavior
  • Diet
  • Information
ispartof: Nutrition Reviews, Jan 2013, Vol.71(1), p.1
description: As standards are considered for nutrition front-of-package (FOP) and shelf-labeling systems in the United States, it is important to know what types of systems are most effective in conveying scientifically accurate and useful information to consumers. A systematic literature review identified 38 empirical studies on consumer response to FOP nutrition labeling and shelf labeling. Studies indicate that consumers can more easily interpret and select healthier products with nutrient-specific FOP nutrition labels that incorporate text and symbolic color to indicate nutrient levels rather than nutrient-specific labels that only emphasize numeric information, such as Guideline Daily Amounts expressed as percentages and/or grams. Summary systems may influence consumers to purchase healthier products. However, more research is needed to assess the influence of nutrient-specific labels on consumers' purchases. This review identified few studies that compared consumers' ability to select healthier products using nutrient-specific systems that incorporate text and color codes with multiple-level summary icons. More research is needed to determine the effects of FOP nutrition labeling on consumers' actual shopping behaviors and dietary intakes. [PUBLICATION ]
language: eng
source:
identifier: ISSN: 00296643
fulltext: fulltext
issn:
  • 00296643
  • 0029-6643
url: Link


@attributes
ID606215104
RANK0.06999999
NO1
SEARCH_ENGINEprimo_central_multiple_fe
SEARCH_ENGINE_TYPEPrimo Central Search Engine
LOCALfalse
PrimoNMBib
record
control
sourcerecordid1269177711
sourceidproquest
recordidTN_proquest1269177711
sourcesystemOther
pqid1269177711
galeid315068313
display
typearticle
titleEffects of front-of-package and shelf nutrition labeling systems on consumers
creatorHersey, James ; Wohlgenant, Kelly ; Arsenault, Joanne ; Kosa, Katherine ; Muth, Mary
ispartofNutrition Reviews, Jan 2013, Vol.71(1), p.1
identifierISSN: 00296643
subjectUnited States–Us ; Nutrition ; Descriptive Labeling ; Consumer Behavior ; Diet ; Information
descriptionAs standards are considered for nutrition front-of-package (FOP) and shelf-labeling systems in the United States, it is important to know what types of systems are most effective in conveying scientifically accurate and useful information to consumers. A systematic literature review identified 38 empirical studies on consumer response to FOP nutrition labeling and shelf labeling. Studies indicate that consumers can more easily interpret and select healthier products with nutrient-specific FOP nutrition labels that incorporate text and symbolic color to indicate nutrient levels rather than nutrient-specific labels that only emphasize numeric information, such as Guideline Daily Amounts expressed as percentages and/or grams. Summary systems may influence consumers to purchase healthier products. However, more research is needed to assess the influence of nutrient-specific labels on consumers' purchases. This review identified few studies that compared consumers' ability to select healthier products using nutrient-specific systems that incorporate text and color codes with multiple-level summary icons. More research is needed to determine the effects of FOP nutrition labeling on consumers' actual shopping behaviors and dietary intakes. [PUBLICATION ]
languageeng
source
version7
lds50peer_reviewed
links
openurl$$Topenurl_article
openurlfulltext$$Topenurlfull_article
backlink$$Uhttp://search.proquest.com/docview/1269177711/?pq-origsite=primo$$EView_record_in_ProQuest_(subscribers_only)
search
creatorcontrib
0Hersey, James
1Wohlgenant, Kelly
2Arsenault, Joanne
3Kosa, Katherine
4Muth, Mary
titleEffects of front-of-package and shelf nutrition labeling systems on consumers
descriptionAs standards are considered for nutrition front-of-package (FOP) and shelf-labeling systems in the United States, it is important to know what types of systems are most effective in conveying scientifically accurate and useful information to consumers. A systematic literature review identified 38 empirical studies on consumer response to FOP nutrition labeling and shelf labeling. Studies indicate that consumers can more easily interpret and select healthier products with nutrient-specific FOP nutrition labels that incorporate text and symbolic color to indicate nutrient levels rather than nutrient-specific labels that only emphasize numeric information, such as Guideline Daily Amounts expressed as percentages and/or grams. Summary systems may influence consumers to purchase healthier products. However, more research is needed to assess the influence of nutrient-specific labels on consumers' purchases. This review identified few studies that compared consumers' ability to select healthier products using nutrient-specific systems that incorporate text and color codes with multiple-level summary icons. More research is needed to determine the effects of FOP nutrition labeling on consumers' actual shopping behaviors and dietary intakes. [PUBLICATION ]
subject
0United States–Us
1Nutrition
2Descriptive Labeling
3Consumer Behavior
4Diet
5Information
general
0English
1Oxford University Press, UK
2Medical Database
3ProQuest Science Journals
4Consumer Health Database
5Health & Medical Collection (Alumni edition)
6Medical Database (Alumni edition)
7Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni edition)
8Science Database (Alumni edition)
9ProQuest Pharma Collection
10Health & Medical Collection
11Nursing & Allied Health Database
12ProQuest Agriculture Journals
13ProQuest Public Health
14Family Health Database (Alumni edition)
15Research Library China
16ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source
17ProQuest Research Library
18ProQuest Discovery
19ProQuest Agricultural Science Collection
20ProQuest Central
21ProQuest Hospital Collection
22ProQuest Natural Science Collection
23Research Library (Alumni edition)
24Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni edition)
25ProQuest SciTech Collection
26ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
27ProQuest Medical Library
28Agricultural & Environmental Science Database
29Natural Science Collection
30ProQuest Central (new)
31ProQuest Central K-12
32ProQuest Central Korea
33Research Library Prep
34SciTech Premium Collection
35Health Research Premium Collection
36Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni edition)
37ProQuest Central Essentials
38eLibrary
39ProQuest Central China
sourceidproquest
recordidproquest1269177711
issn
000296643
10029-6643
rsrctypearticle
creationdate2013
addtitleNutrition Reviews
searchscope
01000273
11000283
21005660
31006454
41006520
51006759
61006761
71006762
81006763
91006765
101006815
111006993
121007015
131007067
141007107
151007160
161007617
171007899
181007906
191007945
201008005
211008174
221008886
231009127
241009191
251009384
2610000020
2710000025
2810000027
2910000034
3010000035
3110000039
3210000047
3310000050
3410000064
3510000117
3610000118
3710000119
3810000120
3910000155
4010000156
4110000157
4210000158
4310000164
4410000234
4510000253
4610000255
4710000256
4810000257
4910000258
5010000259
5110000260
5210000270
5310000271
5410000281
5510000293
5610000300
57proquest
scope
01000273
11000283
21005660
31006454
41006520
51006759
61006761
71006762
81006763
91006765
101006815
111006993
121007015
131007067
141007107
151007160
161007617
171007899
181007906
191007945
201008005
211008174
221008886
231009127
241009191
251009384
2610000020
2710000025
2810000027
2910000034
3010000035
3110000039
3210000047
3310000050
3410000064
3510000117
3610000118
3710000119
3810000120
3910000155
4010000156
4110000157
4210000158
4310000164
4410000234
4510000253
4610000255
4710000256
4810000257
4910000258
5010000259
5110000260
5210000270
5310000271
5410000281
5510000293
5610000300
57proquest
lsr43
01000273false
11000283false
21005660false
31006454false
41006520false
51006759false
61006761false
71006762false
81006763false
91006765false
101006815false
111006993false
121007015false
131007067false
141007107false
151007160false
161007617false
171007899false
181007906false
191007945false
201008005false
211008174false
221008886false
231009127false
241009191false
251009384false
2610000020false
2710000025false
2810000027false
2910000034false
3010000035false
3110000039false
3210000047false
3310000050false
3410000064false
3510000117false
3610000118false
3710000119false
3810000120false
3910000155false
4010000156false
4110000157false
4210000158false
4310000164false
4410000234false
4510000253false
4610000255false
4710000256false
4810000257false
4910000258false
5010000259false
5110000260false
5210000270false
5310000271false
5410000281false
5510000293false
5610000300false
startdate20130101
enddate20130101
citationpf 1 vol 71 issue 1
lsr30VSR-Enriched:[doi, galeid, pqid, eissn, pages]
sort
titleEffects of front-of-package and shelf nutrition labeling systems on consumers
authorHersey, James ; Wohlgenant, Kelly ; Arsenault, Joanne ; Kosa, Katherine ; Muth, Mary
creationdate20130101
lso0120130101
facets
frbrgroupid8366512392110820649
frbrtype5
newrecords20180321
languageeng
creationdate2013
topic
0United States–Us
1Nutrition
2Descriptive Labeling
3Consumer Behavior
4Diet
5Information
collection
0Medical Database
1ProQuest Science Journals
2Consumer Health Database
3Health & Medical Collection (Alumni edition)
4Medical Database (Alumni edition)
5Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni edition)
6Science Database (Alumni edition)
7ProQuest Pharma Collection
8Health & Medical Collection
9Nursing & Allied Health Database
10ProQuest Agriculture Journals
11ProQuest Public Health
12Family Health Database (Alumni edition)
13Research Library China
14ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source
15ProQuest Research Library
16ProQuest Discovery
17ProQuest Agricultural Science Collection
18ProQuest Central
19ProQuest Hospital Collection
20ProQuest Natural Science Collection
21Research Library (Alumni edition)
22Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni edition)
23ProQuest SciTech Collection
24ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
25ProQuest Medical Library
26Agricultural & Environmental Science Database
27Natural Science Collection
28ProQuest Central (new)
29ProQuest Central K-12
30ProQuest Central Korea
31Research Library Prep
32SciTech Premium Collection
33Health Research Premium Collection
34Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni edition)
35ProQuest Central Essentials
36eLibrary
37ProQuest Central China
prefilterarticles
rsrctypearticles
creatorcontrib
0Hersey, James
1Wohlgenant, Kelly
2Arsenault, Joanne
3Kosa, Katherine
4Muth, Mary
jtitleNutrition Reviews
toplevelpeer_reviewed
delivery
delcategoryRemote Search Resource
fulltextfulltext
addata
aulast
0Hersey
1Wohlgenant
2Arsenault
3Kosa
4Muth
aufirst
0James
1Kelly
2Joanne
3Katherine
4Mary
auinit1
0J.
1K.
2M.
au
0Hersey, James
1Wohlgenant, Kelly
2Arsenault, Joanne
3Kosa, Katherine
4Muth, Mary
atitleEffects of front-of-package and shelf nutrition labeling systems on consumers
jtitleNutrition Reviews
risdate20130101
volume71
issue1
spage1
issn00296643
formatjournal
genrearticle
ristypeJOUR
abstractAs standards are considered for nutrition front-of-package (FOP) and shelf-labeling systems in the United States, it is important to know what types of systems are most effective in conveying scientifically accurate and useful information to consumers. A systematic literature review identified 38 empirical studies on consumer response to FOP nutrition labeling and shelf labeling. Studies indicate that consumers can more easily interpret and select healthier products with nutrient-specific FOP nutrition labels that incorporate text and symbolic color to indicate nutrient levels rather than nutrient-specific labels that only emphasize numeric information, such as Guideline Daily Amounts expressed as percentages and/or grams. Summary systems may influence consumers to purchase healthier products. However, more research is needed to assess the influence of nutrient-specific labels on consumers' purchases. This review identified few studies that compared consumers' ability to select healthier products using nutrient-specific systems that incorporate text and color codes with multiple-level summary icons. More research is needed to determine the effects of FOP nutrition labeling on consumers' actual shopping behaviors and dietary intakes. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
copOxford
pubOxford University Press, UK
urlhttp://search.proquest.com/docview/1269177711/
doi10.1111/nure.12000
pages1-14
eissn17534887
date2013-01-01