schliessen

Filtern

 

Bibliotheken

THE SAFAVID THREAT AND JURISTIC AUTHORITY IN THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE DURING THE 16TH CENTURY

This article investigates the opinions of three senior Ottoman jurists, Sarigörez (d. 1522), Kemalpasazade (d. 1534), and Ebussuud (d. 1574), on the subject of the Safavids and their supporters. Historians have treated these opinions as part of the vast polemical literature uniformly intended to jus... Full description

Journal Title: International Journal of Middle East Studies May 2017, pp.295-314
Main Author: Atçil, Abdurrahman
Format: Electronic Article Electronic Article
Language: English
Subjects:
Law
Law
Law
ID: ISSN: 00207438 ; E-ISSN: 14716380 ; DOI: 10.1017/S002074381700006X
Link: http://search.proquest.com/docview/1889753548/?pq-origsite=primo
Zum Text:
SendSend as email Add to Book BagAdd to Book Bag
Staff View
recordid: proquest1889753548
title: THE SAFAVID THREAT AND JURISTIC AUTHORITY IN THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE DURING THE 16TH CENTURY
format: Article
creator:
  • Atçil, Abdurrahman
subjects:
  • Ottoman Empire
  • Imperialism
  • Historians
  • Law
  • History
  • Interpreters
  • Law
  • Literary Criticism
  • Attitudes
  • History and Theory
  • Political History/Historiography
  • Government/Political Systems
  • National Governments/Political Systems
  • Jurists
  • Law
  • Ottomans
  • Qizilbash
  • Safavids
ispartof: International Journal of Middle East Studies, May 2017, pp.295-314
description: This article investigates the opinions of three senior Ottoman jurists, Sarigörez (d. 1522), Kemalpasazade (d. 1534), and Ebussuud (d. 1574), on the subject of the Safavids and their supporters. Historians have treated these opinions as part of the vast polemical literature uniformly intended to justify an impending Ottoman attack against their Safavid rivals. Questioning the notion that all authors shared an undifferentiated attitude, this article underlines that, unlike most polemical literature, the opinions of these three jurists focused on the religiolegal aspects of the Safavid issue and varied and evolved in line with changing historical realities, the jurists' divergent assessments of the Safavid threat, and their preference for different jurisprudential doctrines. Based on an analysis of the opinions, I argue that these jurists assumed a high degree of autonomy as producers and interpreters of the law and thus did not necessarily feel obliged to legitimate or excuse every imperial action.
language: eng
source:
identifier: ISSN: 00207438 ; E-ISSN: 14716380 ; DOI: 10.1017/S002074381700006X
fulltext: fulltext
issn:
  • 00207438
  • 0020-7438
  • 14716380
  • 1471-6380
url: Link


@attributes
ID1449966538
RANK0.07
NO1
SEARCH_ENGINEprimo_central_multiple_fe
SEARCH_ENGINE_TYPEPrimo Central Search Engine
LOCALfalse
PrimoNMBib
record
control
sourcerecordid1889753548
sourceidproquest
recordidTN_proquest1889753548
sourcesystemOther
pqid1889753548
galeid491368804
cupidS002074381700006X
display
typearticle
titleTHE SAFAVID THREAT AND JURISTIC AUTHORITY IN THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE DURING THE 16TH CENTURY
creatorAtçil, Abdurrahman
ispartofInternational Journal of Middle East Studies, May 2017, pp.295-314
identifier
subjectOttoman Empire ; Imperialism ; Historians ; Law ; History ; Interpreters ; Law ; Literary Criticism ; Attitudes ; History and Theory; Political History/Historiography ; Government/Political Systems; National Governments/Political Systems ; Jurists ; Law ; Ottomans ; Qizilbash ; Safavids
descriptionThis article investigates the opinions of three senior Ottoman jurists, Sarigörez (d. 1522), Kemalpasazade (d. 1534), and Ebussuud (d. 1574), on the subject of the Safavids and their supporters. Historians have treated these opinions as part of the vast polemical literature uniformly intended to justify an impending Ottoman attack against their Safavid rivals. Questioning the notion that all authors shared an undifferentiated attitude, this article underlines that, unlike most polemical literature, the opinions of these three jurists focused on the religiolegal aspects of the Safavid issue and varied and evolved in line with changing historical realities, the jurists' divergent assessments of the Safavid threat, and their preference for different jurisprudential doctrines. Based on an analysis of the opinions, I argue that these jurists assumed a high degree of autonomy as producers and interpreters of the law and thus did not necessarily feel obliged to legitimate or excuse every imperial action.
languageeng
source
version4
lds50peer_reviewed
links
openurl$$Topenurl_article
openurlfulltext$$Topenurlfull_article
backlink$$Uhttp://search.proquest.com/docview/1889753548/?pq-origsite=primo$$EView_record_in_ProQuest_(subscribers_only)
search
creatorcontribAtçil, Abdurrahman
titleTHE SAFAVID THREAT AND JURISTIC AUTHORITY IN THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE DURING THE 16TH CENTURY
descriptionThis article investigates the opinions of three senior Ottoman jurists, Sarigörez (d. 1522), Kemalpasazade (d. 1534), and Ebussuud (d. 1574), on the subject of the Safavids and their supporters. Historians have treated these opinions as part of the vast polemical literature uniformly intended to justify an impending Ottoman attack against their Safavid rivals. Questioning the notion that all authors shared an undifferentiated attitude, this article underlines that, unlike most polemical literature, the opinions of these three jurists focused on the religiolegal aspects of the Safavid issue and varied and evolved in line with changing historical realities, the jurists' divergent assessments of the Safavid threat, and their preference for different jurisprudential doctrines. Based on an analysis of the opinions, I argue that these jurists assumed a high degree of autonomy as producers and interpreters of the law and thus did not necessarily feel obliged to legitimate or excuse every imperial action.
subject
0Ottoman Empire
1Imperialism
2Historians
3Law
4History
5Interpreters
6Literary Criticism
7Attitudes
8History and Theory; Political History/Historiography
9Government/Political Systems; National Governments/Political Systems
10Jurists
11Ottomans
12Qizilbash
13Safavids
149001
159085
16jurists
17law
general
0English
1Cambridge University Press
210.1017/S002074381700006X
3Arts & Humanities Full Text
4ProQuest Political Science
5Social Science Database (Alumni edition)
6ProQuest Military Collection
7ProQuest Social Science Journals
8Military Database (Alumni edition)
9International Bibliography of the Social Sciences
10Worldwide Political Science Abstracts
11DELNET Social Sciences & Humanities Collection
12ProQuest Research Library
13ProQuest Central
14Research Library (Alumni edition)
15International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)
16ProQuest Art, Design and Architecture Collection
17ProQuest Business Collection
18ProQuest Politics Collection
19ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection
20ProQuest Sociology Collection
21Arts Premium Collection
22Politics Collection
23ProQuest Central (new)
24ProQuest Central K-12
25ProQuest Central Korea
26Research Library Prep
27Social Science Premium Collection
28ProQuest Central Essentials
29ProQuest One Academic
sourceidproquest
recordidproquest1889753548
issn
000207438
10020-7438
214716380
31471-6380
rsrctypearticle
creationdate2017
addtitleInternational Journal of Middle East Studies
searchscope
01000277
11005660
21005684
31006454
41006759
51006766
61006993
71007015
81007156
91007200
101007296
111007409
121007566
131007900
141007903
151007945
161008006
171008009
181008867
191008886
201009127
211009730
2210000025
2310000034
2410000039
2510000064
2610000118
2710000144
2810000146
2910000164
3010000180
3110000181
3210000182
3310000183
3410000184
3510000185
3610000235
3710000254
3810000255
3910000256
4010000257
4110000258
4210000259
4310000262
4410000281
4510000348
4610000357
4710000360
48proquest
scope
01000277
11005660
21005684
31006454
41006759
51006766
61006993
71007015
81007156
91007200
101007296
111007409
121007566
131007900
141007903
151007945
161008006
171008009
181008867
191008886
201009127
211009730
2210000025
2310000034
2410000039
2510000064
2610000118
2710000144
2810000146
2910000164
3010000180
3110000181
3210000182
3310000183
3410000184
3510000185
3610000235
3710000254
3810000255
3910000256
4010000257
4110000258
4210000259
4310000262
4410000281
4510000348
4610000357
4710000360
48proquest
lsr43
01000277true
11005660true
21005684true
31006454true
41006759true
51006766true
61006993true
71007015true
81007156true
91007200true
101007296true
111007409false
121007566false
131007900true
141007903true
151007945true
161008006true
171008009true
181008867true
191008886true
201009127true
211009730true
2210000025true
2310000034true
2410000039true
2510000064true
2610000118true
2710000144false
2810000146false
2910000164true
3010000180true
3110000181false
3210000182false
3310000183true
3410000184true
3510000185false
3610000235true
3710000254true
3810000255true
3910000256true
4010000257true
4110000258true
4210000259true
4310000262true
4410000281true
4510000348true
4610000357true
4710000360true
startdate20170501
enddate20170501
citationpf 295 pt 314
lsr30VSR-Enriched:[cupid, pqid, issue, galeid, vol]
sort
titleTHE SAFAVID THREAT AND JURISTIC AUTHORITY IN THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE DURING THE 16TH CENTURY
authorAtçil, Abdurrahman
creationdate20170501
lso0120170501
facets
frbrgroupid6577045864497079652
frbrtype5
newrecords20170430
languageeng
creationdate2017
topic
0Ottoman Empire
1Imperialism
2Historians
3Law
4History
5Interpreters
6Literary Criticism
7Attitudes
8History and Theory; Political History/Historiography
9Government/Political Systems; National Governments/Political Systems
10Jurists
11Ottomans
12Qizilbash
13Safavids
collection
0Arts & Humanities Full Text
1ProQuest Political Science
2Social Science Database (Alumni edition)
3ProQuest Military Collection
4ProQuest Social Science Journals
5Military Database (Alumni edition)
6International Bibliography of the Social Sciences
7Worldwide Political Science Abstracts
8DELNET Social Sciences & Humanities Collection
9ProQuest Research Library
10ProQuest Central
11Research Library (Alumni edition)
12International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)
13ProQuest Art, Design and Architecture Collection
14ProQuest Business Collection
15ProQuest Politics Collection
16ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection
17ProQuest Sociology Collection
18Arts Premium Collection
19Politics Collection
20ProQuest Central (new)
21ProQuest Central K-12
22ProQuest Central Korea
23Research Library Prep
24Social Science Premium Collection
25ProQuest Central Essentials
26ProQuest One Academic
prefilterarticles
rsrctypearticles
creatorcontribAtçil, Abdurrahman
jtitleInternational Journal of Middle East Studies
toplevelpeer_reviewed
delivery
delcategoryRemote Search Resource
fulltextfulltext
addata
aulastAtçil
aufirstAbdurrahman
auAtçil, Abdurrahman
atitleTHE SAFAVID THREAT AND JURISTIC AUTHORITY IN THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE DURING THE 16TH CENTURY
jtitleInternational Journal of Middle East Studies
risdate20170501
spage295
epage314
pages295-314
issn00207438
eissn14716380
formatjournal
genrearticle
ristypeJOUR
abstractThis article investigates the opinions of three senior Ottoman jurists, Sarigörez (d. 1522), Kemalpasazade (d. 1534), and Ebussuud (d. 1574), on the subject of the Safavids and their supporters. Historians have treated these opinions as part of the vast polemical literature uniformly intended to justify an impending Ottoman attack against their Safavid rivals. Questioning the notion that all authors shared an undifferentiated attitude, this article underlines that, unlike most polemical literature, the opinions of these three jurists focused on the religiolegal aspects of the Safavid issue and varied and evolved in line with changing historical realities, the jurists' divergent assessments of the Safavid threat, and their preference for different jurisprudential doctrines. Based on an analysis of the opinions, I argue that these jurists assumed a high degree of autonomy as producers and interpreters of the law and thus did not necessarily feel obliged to legitimate or excuse every imperial action.
copCambridge
pubCambridge University Press
doi10.1017/S002074381700006X
urlhttp://search.proquest.com/docview/1889753548/
issue2
volume49
date2017-05-01