schliessen

Filtern

 

Bibliotheken

Traction table versus double reverse traction repositor in the treatment of femoral shaft fractures.

A novel reduction technique of intramedullary nailing (IMN) for femoral shaft fractures was introduced, and in this study, its therapeutic effect was compared with patients treated with the traditional traction table. From November 2012 to August 2015, the patients with femoral shaft fractures fixed... Full description

Journal Title: Scientific reports April 13, 2018, Vol.8(1), p.5952
Main Author: Zhang, Ruipeng
Other Authors: Yin, Yingchao , Li, Shilun , Jin, Lin , Hou, Zhiyong , Zhang, Yingze
Format: Electronic Article Electronic Article
Language: English
Subjects:
ID: E-ISSN: 2045-2322 ; DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-24317-y
Link: http://search.proquest.com/docview/2025319495/?pq-origsite=primo
Zum Text:
SendSend as email Add to Book BagAdd to Book Bag
Staff View
recordid: proquest2025319495
title: Traction table versus double reverse traction repositor in the treatment of femoral shaft fractures.
format: Article
creator:
  • Zhang, Ruipeng
  • Yin, Yingchao
  • Li, Shilun
  • Jin, Lin
  • Hou, Zhiyong
  • Zhang, Yingze
subjects:
  • Adult–Surgery
  • Bone Nails–Methods
  • Female–Physiology
  • Femoral Fractures–Physiology
  • Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary–Methods
  • Fracture Healing–Methods
  • Humans–Methods
  • Male–Methods
  • Recovery of Function–Methods
  • Retrospective Studies–Methods
  • Traction–Methods
  • Treatment Outcome–Methods
ispartof: Scientific reports, April 13, 2018, Vol.8(1), p.5952
description: A novel reduction technique of intramedullary nailing (IMN) for femoral shaft fractures was introduced, and in this study, its therapeutic effect was compared with patients treated with the traditional traction table. From November 2012 to August 2015, the patients with femoral shaft fractures fixed with anterograde IMN were reviewed. Seventy-four patients treated with the traction table and forty-eight patients treated with the double reverse traction repositor (DRTR) met the inclusion criteria of this study. The surgical time, blood loss, open reduction rate and complications were reviewed in this study. The fracture healing was assessed by the radiographs conducted at each follow-up. The functional outcome (hip and knee flexion, Harris Hip Score, and Lysholm knee score) was evaluated at the final follow-up. Average surgical time, blood loss, hip and knee flexion, and Harris Hip Score showed no difference (P > 0.05) between the two groups. However, the DRTR was superior to the traction table in fracture healing, Lysholm knee score, open reduction and complications rate (P 
language: eng
source:
identifier: E-ISSN: 2045-2322 ; DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-24317-y
fulltext: fulltext
issn:
  • 20452322
  • 2045-2322
url: Link


@attributes
ID255263284
RANK0.07
NO1
SEARCH_ENGINEprimo_central_multiple_fe
SEARCH_ENGINE_TYPEPrimo Central Search Engine
LOCALfalse
PrimoNMBib
record
control
sourcerecordid2025319495
sourceidproquest
recordidTN_proquest2025319495
sourcesystemPC
pqid2025319495
display
typearticle
titleTraction table versus double reverse traction repositor in the treatment of femoral shaft fractures.
creatorZhang, Ruipeng ; Yin, Yingchao ; Li, Shilun ; Jin, Lin ; Hou, Zhiyong ; Zhang, Yingze
contributorZhang, Ruipeng (correspondence author) ; Zhang, Ruipeng (record owner)
ispartofScientific reports, April 13, 2018, Vol.8(1), p.5952
identifierE-ISSN: 2045-2322 ; DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-24317-y
subjectAdult–Surgery ; Bone Nails–Methods ; Female–Physiology ; Femoral Fractures–Physiology ; Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary–Methods ; Fracture Healing–Methods ; Humans–Methods ; Male–Methods ; Recovery of Function–Methods ; Retrospective Studies–Methods ; Traction–Methods ; Treatment Outcome–Methods
languageeng
source
descriptionA novel reduction technique of intramedullary nailing (IMN) for femoral shaft fractures was introduced, and in this study, its therapeutic effect was compared with patients treated with the traditional traction table. From November 2012 to August 2015, the patients with femoral shaft fractures fixed with anterograde IMN were reviewed. Seventy-four patients treated with the traction table and forty-eight patients treated with the double reverse traction repositor (DRTR) met the inclusion criteria of this study. The surgical time, blood loss, open reduction rate and complications were reviewed in this study. The fracture healing was assessed by the radiographs conducted at each follow-up. The functional outcome (hip and knee flexion, Harris Hip Score, and Lysholm knee score) was evaluated at the final follow-up. Average surgical time, blood loss, hip and knee flexion, and Harris Hip Score showed no difference (P > 0.05) between the two groups. However, the DRTR was superior to the traction table in fracture healing, Lysholm knee score, open reduction and complications rate (P < 0.05). Thus, we concluded that minimally invasive treatment of femoral shaft fractures could be obtained with the DRTR.
version5
lds50peer_reviewed
links
openurl$$Topenurl_article
openurlfulltext$$Topenurlfull_article
backlink$$Uhttp://search.proquest.com/docview/2025319495/?pq-origsite=primo$$EView_record_in_ProQuest_(subscribers_only)
search
creatorcontrib
0Zhang, Ruipeng
1Yin, Yingchao
2Li, Shilun
3Jin, Lin
4Hou, Zhiyong
5Zhang, Yingze
titleTraction table versus double reverse traction repositor in the treatment of femoral shaft fractures.
subject
0Adult–Surgery
1Bone Nails–Methods
2Female–Physiology
3Femoral Fractures–Physiology
4Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary–Methods
5Fracture Healing–Methods
6Humans–Methods
7Male–Methods
8Recovery of Function–Methods
9Retrospective Studies–Methods
10Traction–Methods
11Treatment Outcome–Methods
general
0English
110.1038/s41598-018-24317-y
2MEDLINE (ProQuest)
3ProQuest Biological Science Collection
4ProQuest Natural Science Collection
5ProQuest SciTech Collection
6Biological Science Database
7Natural Science Collection
8SciTech Premium Collection
9Health Research Premium Collection
10Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni edition)
11Biological Science Index (ProQuest)
sourceidproquest
recordidproquest2025319495
issn
020452322
12045-2322
rsrctypearticle
creationdate2018
addtitleScientific reports
searchscope
01007527
11007944
21009130
310000004
410000038
510000050
610000120
710000159
810000238
910000253
1010000260
1110000270
1210000271
1310000302
1410000350
15proquest
scope
01007527
11007944
21009130
310000004
410000038
510000050
610000120
710000159
810000238
910000253
1010000260
1110000270
1210000271
1310000302
1410000350
15proquest
lsr43
01007527false
11007944false
21009130false
310000004false
410000038false
510000050false
610000120false
710000159false
810000238false
910000253false
1010000260false
1110000270false
1210000271false
1310000302false
1410000350false
contributorZhang, Ruipeng
startdate20180413
enddate20180413
citationpf 5952 pt 5952 vol 8 issue 1
lsr30VSR-Enriched:[description, pqid]
sort
titleTraction table versus double reverse traction repositor in the treatment of femoral shaft fractures.
authorZhang, Ruipeng ; Yin, Yingchao ; Li, Shilun ; Jin, Lin ; Hou, Zhiyong ; Zhang, Yingze
creationdate20180413
lso0120180413
facets
frbrgroupid-1964487938549316893
frbrtype5
newrecords20181218
languageeng
creationdate2018
topic
0Adult–Surgery
1Bone Nails–Methods
2Female–Physiology
3Femoral Fractures–Physiology
4Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary–Methods
5Fracture Healing–Methods
6Humans–Methods
7Male–Methods
8Recovery of Function–Methods
9Retrospective Studies–Methods
10Traction–Methods
11Treatment Outcome–Methods
collection
0MEDLINE (ProQuest)
1ProQuest Biological Science Collection
2ProQuest Natural Science Collection
3ProQuest SciTech Collection
4Biological Science Database
5Natural Science Collection
6SciTech Premium Collection
7Health Research Premium Collection
8Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni edition)
9Biological Science Index (ProQuest)
prefilterarticles
rsrctypearticles
creatorcontrib
0Zhang, Ruipeng
1Yin, Yingchao
2Li, Shilun
3Jin, Lin
4Hou, Zhiyong
5Zhang, Yingze
jtitleScientific reports
toplevelpeer_reviewed
delivery
delcategoryRemote Search Resource
fulltextfulltext
addata
aulast
0Zhang
1Yin
2Li
3Jin
4Hou
aufirst
0Ruipeng
1Yingchao
2Shilun
3Lin
4Zhiyong
5Yingze
au
0Zhang, Ruipeng
1Yin, Yingchao
2Li, Shilun
3Jin, Lin
4Hou, Zhiyong
5Zhang, Yingze
addauZhang, Ruipeng
atitleTraction table versus double reverse traction repositor in the treatment of femoral shaft fractures.
jtitleScientific reports
risdate20180413
volume8
issue1
spage5952
epage5952
pages5952
eissn2045-2322
formatjournal
genrearticle
ristypeJOUR
doi10.1038/s41598-018-24317-y
urlhttp://search.proquest.com/docview/2025319495/
date2018-04-13