schliessen

Filtern

 

Bibliotheken

Off-pump bypass grafting in patients with significant left main coronary artery stenosis

The aim of this study was to investigate and determine whether patients with significant (≧%50) left main coronary artery stenosis could undergo coronary bypass on the beating heart and compare the results to those obtained using the conventional method. Prospectively collected data of patients with... Full description

Journal Title: Heart and Vessels 2004, Vol.19(1), pp.8-12
Main Author: Saba, Davit
Other Authors: Ener, Serdar , BıÇer, Murat , Kan AytaÇ, İrem İris , S¸enkaya, Is¸ık , Özkan, Hayati
Format: Electronic Article Electronic Article
Language: English
Subjects:
ID: ISSN: 0910-8327 ; E-ISSN: 1615-2573 ; DOI: 10.1007/s00380-003-0717-9
Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00380-003-0717-9
Zum Text:
SendSend as email Add to Book BagAdd to Book Bag
Staff View
recordid: springer_jour10.1007/s00380-003-0717-9
title: Off-pump bypass grafting in patients with significant left main coronary artery stenosis
format: Article
creator:
  • Saba, Davit
  • Ener, Serdar
  • BıÇer, Murat
  • Kan AytaÇ, İrem İris
  • S¸enkaya, Is¸ık
  • Özkan, Hayati
subjects:
  • Left main coronary artery stenosis
  • Beating heart
  • Coronary bypass
ispartof: Heart and Vessels, 2004, Vol.19(1), pp.8-12
description: The aim of this study was to investigate and determine whether patients with significant (≧%50) left main coronary artery stenosis could undergo coronary bypass on the beating heart and compare the results to those obtained using the conventional method. Prospectively collected data of patients with significant left main coronary artery disease who had undergone coronary bypass on the beating heart (group A, n = 100) or with the conventional method (group B, n = 100) were evaluated retrospectively. EuroSCORE values, preoperative and operative details, postoperative morbidity and mortality, and early results were compared. Groups were similar in terms of EuroSCORE, demographics, and preoperative variables. Number of distal anastomoses per patient was 3.1 ± 0.9 in the beating heart group while it was 3.3 ± 0.9 in the conventional group ( P = 0.09). Patients operated on with the conventional method had higher levels of peak creatine kinase-myocardial band, blood and blood product transfusions, and inotropic requirements, while mechanical ventilation times and hospital stay were longer. The incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation, mediastinitis, and intra-aortic balloon usage were comparable between the groups. There was no neurological complication in group A whereas five major neurological complications (three transient ischemic attacks, two strokes) occurred in group B ( P = 0.06). Thirty-day mortality occurred in one patient in the beating heart group whereas five early deaths were observed in the conventional group ( P = 0.21). In significant left main coronary artery stenosis coronary bypass on the beating heart is a safe and effective alternative to the conventional method with the same or better early results. The long-term results need to be evaluated.
language: eng
source:
identifier: ISSN: 0910-8327 ; E-ISSN: 1615-2573 ; DOI: 10.1007/s00380-003-0717-9
fulltext: fulltext
issn:
  • 1615-2573
  • 16152573
  • 0910-8327
  • 09108327
url: Link


@attributes
ID1555810420
RANK0.07
NO1
SEARCH_ENGINEprimo_central_multiple_fe
SEARCH_ENGINE_TYPEPrimo Central Search Engine
LOCALfalse
PrimoNMBib
record
control
sourcerecordid10.1007/s00380-003-0717-9
sourceidspringer_jour
recordidTN_springer_jour10.1007/s00380-003-0717-9
sourcesystemOther
pqid196900222
galeid154140682
display
typearticle
titleOff-pump bypass grafting in patients with significant left main coronary artery stenosis
creatorSaba, Davit ; Ener, Serdar ; BıÇer, Murat ; Kan AytaÇ, İrem İris ; S¸enkaya, Is¸ık ; Özkan, Hayati
ispartofHeart and Vessels, 2004, Vol.19(1), pp.8-12
identifier
subjectLeft main coronary artery stenosis ; Beating heart ; Coronary bypass
descriptionThe aim of this study was to investigate and determine whether patients with significant (≧%50) left main coronary artery stenosis could undergo coronary bypass on the beating heart and compare the results to those obtained using the conventional method. Prospectively collected data of patients with significant left main coronary artery disease who had undergone coronary bypass on the beating heart (group A, n = 100) or with the conventional method (group B, n = 100) were evaluated retrospectively. EuroSCORE values, preoperative and operative details, postoperative morbidity and mortality, and early results were compared. Groups were similar in terms of EuroSCORE, demographics, and preoperative variables. Number of distal anastomoses per patient was 3.1 ± 0.9 in the beating heart group while it was 3.3 ± 0.9 in the conventional group ( P = 0.09). Patients operated on with the conventional method had higher levels of peak creatine kinase-myocardial band, blood and blood product transfusions, and inotropic requirements, while mechanical ventilation times and hospital stay were longer. The incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation, mediastinitis, and intra-aortic balloon usage were comparable between the groups. There was no neurological complication in group A whereas five major neurological complications (three transient ischemic attacks, two strokes) occurred in group B ( P = 0.06). Thirty-day mortality occurred in one patient in the beating heart group whereas five early deaths were observed in the conventional group ( P = 0.21). In significant left main coronary artery stenosis coronary bypass on the beating heart is a safe and effective alternative to the conventional method with the same or better early results. The long-term results need to be evaluated.
languageeng
source
version7
lds50peer_reviewed
links
openurl$$Topenurl_article
openurlfulltext$$Topenurlfull_article
backlink$$Uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00380-003-0717-9$$EView_full_text_in_Springer_(Subscribers_only)
search
creatorcontrib
0Saba, Davit
1Ener, Serdar
2BıÇer, Murat
3Kan AytaÇ, İrem İris
4S¸enkaya, Is¸ık
5Özkan, Hayati
titleOff-pump bypass grafting in patients with significant left main coronary artery stenosis
descriptionThe aim of this study was to investigate and determine whether patients with significant (≧%50) left main coronary artery stenosis could undergo coronary bypass on the beating heart and compare the results to those obtained using the conventional method. Prospectively collected data of patients with significant left main coronary artery disease who had undergone coronary bypass on the beating heart (group A, n = 100) or with the conventional method (group B, n = 100) were evaluated retrospectively. EuroSCORE values, preoperative and operative details, postoperative morbidity and mortality, and early results were compared. Groups were similar in terms of EuroSCORE, demographics, and preoperative variables. Number of distal anastomoses per patient was 3.1 ± 0.9 in the beating heart group while it was 3.3 ± 0.9 in the conventional group ( P = 0.09). Patients operated on with the conventional method had higher levels of peak creatine kinase-myocardial band, blood and blood product transfusions, and inotropic requirements, while mechanical ventilation times and hospital stay were longer. The incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation, mediastinitis, and intra-aortic balloon usage were comparable between the groups. There was no neurological complication in group A whereas five major neurological complications (three transient ischemic attacks, two strokes) occurred in group B ( P = 0.06). Thirty-day mortality occurred in one patient in the beating heart group whereas five early deaths were observed in the conventional group ( P = 0.21). In significant left main coronary artery stenosis coronary bypass on the beating heart is a safe and effective alternative to the conventional method with the same or better early results. The long-term results need to be evaluated.
subject
0Left main coronary artery stenosis
1Beating heart
2Coronary bypass
general
010.1007/s00380-003-0717-9
1English
2Springer Science & Business Media B.V.
3SpringerLink
sourceidspringer_jour
recordidspringer_jour10.1007/s00380-003-0717-9
issn
01615-2573
116152573
20910-8327
309108327
rsrctypearticle
creationdate2004
addtitle
0Heart and Vessels
1An International Journal
2Heart Vessels
searchscopespringer_journals_complete
scopespringer_journals_complete
lsr30VSR-Enriched:[pqid, pages, galeid]
sort
titleOff-pump bypass grafting in patients with significant left main coronary artery stenosis
authorSaba, Davit ; Ener, Serdar ; BıÇer, Murat ; Kan AytaÇ, İrem İris ; S¸enkaya, Is¸ık ; Özkan, Hayati
creationdate20040100
facets
frbrgroupid1076133214096126237
frbrtype5
languageeng
creationdate2004
topic
0Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis
1Beating Heart
2Coronary Bypass
collectionSpringerLink
prefilterarticles
rsrctypearticles
creatorcontrib
0Saba, Davit
1Ener, Serdar
2BıÇer, Murat
3Kan AytaÇ, İrem İris
4S¸enkaya, Is¸ık
5Özkan, Hayati
jtitleHeart And Vessels
toplevelpeer_reviewed
delivery
delcategoryRemote Search Resource
fulltextfulltext
addata
aulast
0Saba
1Ener
2BıÇer
3Kan AytaÇ
4S¸enkaya
5Özkan
aufirst
0Davit
1Serdar
2Murat
3İrem İris
4Is¸ık
5Hayati
au
0Saba, Davit
1Ener, Serdar
2BıÇer, Murat
3Kan AytaÇ, İrem İris
4S¸enkaya, Is¸ık
5Özkan, Hayati
atitleOff-pump bypass grafting in patients with significant left main coronary artery stenosis
jtitleHeart and Vessels
stitleHeart Vessels
addtitleAn International Journal
risdate200401
volume19
issue1
spage8
epage12
issn0910-8327
eissn1615-2573
genrearticle
ristypeJOUR
abstractThe aim of this study was to investigate and determine whether patients with significant (≧%50) left main coronary artery stenosis could undergo coronary bypass on the beating heart and compare the results to those obtained using the conventional method. Prospectively collected data of patients with significant left main coronary artery disease who had undergone coronary bypass on the beating heart (group A, n = 100) or with the conventional method (group B, n = 100) were evaluated retrospectively. EuroSCORE values, preoperative and operative details, postoperative morbidity and mortality, and early results were compared. Groups were similar in terms of EuroSCORE, demographics, and preoperative variables. Number of distal anastomoses per patient was 3.1 ± 0.9 in the beating heart group while it was 3.3 ± 0.9 in the conventional group ( P = 0.09). Patients operated on with the conventional method had higher levels of peak creatine kinase-myocardial band, blood and blood product transfusions, and inotropic requirements, while mechanical ventilation times and hospital stay were longer. The incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation, mediastinitis, and intra-aortic balloon usage were comparable between the groups. There was no neurological complication in group A whereas five major neurological complications (three transient ischemic attacks, two strokes) occurred in group B ( P = 0.06). Thirty-day mortality occurred in one patient in the beating heart group whereas five early deaths were observed in the conventional group ( P = 0.21). In significant left main coronary artery stenosis coronary bypass on the beating heart is a safe and effective alternative to the conventional method with the same or better early results. The long-term results need to be evaluated.
copTokyo
pubSpringer-Verlag
doi10.1007/s00380-003-0717-9
pages8-12
date2004-01