schliessen

Filtern

 

Bibliotheken

Non-English journals and papers in physics and chemistry: bias in citations?

This study investigates, at the journal as well as the article level, if there is a difference in citations between English-language and non-English publications. The Web of Knowledge is used as data source. The investigation focuses on the fields of physics and chemistry. Using a precise definition... Full description

Journal Title: Scientometrics 2013, Vol.95(1), pp.333-350
Main Author: Liang, Liming
Other Authors: Rousseau, Ronald , Zhong, Zhen
Format: Electronic Article Electronic Article
Language: English
Subjects:
ID: ISSN: 0138-9130 ; E-ISSN: 1588-2861 ; DOI: 10.1007/s11192-012-0828-0
Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0828-0
Zum Text:
SendSend as email Add to Book BagAdd to Book Bag
Staff View
recordid: springer_jour10.1007/s11192-012-0828-0
title: Non-English journals and papers in physics and chemistry: bias in citations?
format: Article
creator:
  • Liang, Liming
  • Rousseau, Ronald
  • Zhong, Zhen
subjects:
  • Non-English journal
  • Non-English paper
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Citation
  • Bias
ispartof: Scientometrics, 2013, Vol.95(1), pp.333-350
description: This study investigates, at the journal as well as the article level, if there is a difference in citations between English-language and non-English publications. The Web of Knowledge is used as data source. The investigation focuses on the fields of physics and chemistry. Using a precise definition of a “non-English journal”, we filter out nine physics and thirty-four chemistry non-English journals, scattered over six physics and seven chemistry subfields. Average received citations per paper (CpP) of the non-English journal(s) are compared with the CpP of pure English journals, and this in the same subfield. We clearly observe that non-English journals are inferior—in number of citations received—to pure English journals and this in all physics and chemistry subfields studied. Further, twelve physics journals and ten chemistry journals were chosen as sample journals to compare the CpP of non-English papers with that of English language papers in the same journal. The result of this comparison is that for the majority of these journals and for most of the publication years the CpP of non-English papers is lower than that of the English language papers. Finally, analyzing linguistic characteristics of the citing literature confirms the own-language preference in non-English physics and chemistry journals.
language: eng
source:
identifier: ISSN: 0138-9130 ; E-ISSN: 1588-2861 ; DOI: 10.1007/s11192-012-0828-0
fulltext: fulltext
issn:
  • 1588-2861
  • 15882861
  • 0138-9130
  • 01389130
url: Link


@attributes
ID1728261971
RANK0.07
NO1
SEARCH_ENGINEprimo_central_multiple_fe
SEARCH_ENGINE_TYPEPrimo Central Search Engine
LOCALfalse
PrimoNMBib
record
control
sourcerecordid10.1007/s11192-012-0828-0
sourceidspringer_jour
recordidTN_springer_jour10.1007/s11192-012-0828-0
sourcesystemPC
pqid1718055244
galeid323558950
display
typearticle
titleNon-English journals and papers in physics and chemistry: bias in citations?
creatorLiang, Liming ; Rousseau, Ronald ; Zhong, Zhen
ispartofScientometrics, 2013, Vol.95(1), pp.333-350
identifier
subjectNon-English journal ; Non-English paper ; Physics ; Chemistry ; Citation ; Bias
descriptionThis study investigates, at the journal as well as the article level, if there is a difference in citations between English-language and non-English publications. The Web of Knowledge is used as data source. The investigation focuses on the fields of physics and chemistry. Using a precise definition of a “non-English journal”, we filter out nine physics and thirty-four chemistry non-English journals, scattered over six physics and seven chemistry subfields. Average received citations per paper (CpP) of the non-English journal(s) are compared with the CpP of pure English journals, and this in the same subfield. We clearly observe that non-English journals are inferior—in number of citations received—to pure English journals and this in all physics and chemistry subfields studied. Further, twelve physics journals and ten chemistry journals were chosen as sample journals to compare the CpP of non-English papers with that of English language papers in the same journal. The result of this comparison is that for the majority of these journals and for most of the publication years the CpP of non-English papers is lower than that of the English language papers. Finally, analyzing linguistic characteristics of the citing literature confirms the own-language preference in non-English physics and chemistry journals.
languageeng
source
version6
lds50peer_reviewed
links
openurl$$Topenurl_article
openurlfulltext$$Topenurlfull_article
backlink$$Uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0828-0$$EView_full_text_in_Springer_(Subscribers_only)
search
creatorcontrib
0Liang, Liming
1Rousseau, Ronald
2Zhong, Zhen
titleNon-English journals and papers in physics and chemistry: bias in citations?
descriptionThis study investigates, at the journal as well as the article level, if there is a difference in citations between English-language and non-English publications. The Web of Knowledge is used as data source. The investigation focuses on the fields of physics and chemistry. Using a precise definition of a “non-English journal”, we filter out nine physics and thirty-four chemistry non-English journals, scattered over six physics and seven chemistry subfields. Average received citations per paper (CpP) of the non-English journal(s) are compared with the CpP of pure English journals, and this in the same subfield. We clearly observe that non-English journals are inferior—in number of citations received—to pure English journals and this in all physics and chemistry subfields studied. Further, twelve physics journals and ten chemistry journals were chosen as sample journals to compare the CpP of non-English papers with that of English language papers in the same journal. The result of this comparison is that for the majority of these journals and for most of the publication years the CpP of non-English papers is lower than that of the English language papers. Finally, analyzing linguistic characteristics of the citing literature confirms the own-language preference in non-English physics and chemistry journals.
subject
0Non-English journal
1Non-English paper
2Physics
3Chemistry
4Citation
5Bias
general
010.1007/s11192-012-0828-0
1English
2Springer Science & Business Media B.V.
3SpringerLink
sourceidspringer_jour
recordidspringer_jour10.1007/s11192-012-0828-0
issn
01588-2861
115882861
20138-9130
301389130
rsrctypearticle
creationdate2013
addtitle
0Scientometrics
1An International Journal for all Quantitative Aspects of the Science of Science, Communication in Science and Science Policy
searchscopespringer_journals_complete
scopespringer_journals_complete
lsr30VSR-Enriched:[pages, galeid, pqid]
sort
titleNon-English journals and papers in physics and chemistry: bias in citations?
authorLiang, Liming ; Rousseau, Ronald ; Zhong, Zhen
creationdate20130400
facets
frbrgroupid1877588709845830855
frbrtype5
languageeng
creationdate2013
topic
0Non-English Journal
1Non-English Paper
2Physics
3Chemistry
4Citation
5Bias
collectionSpringerLink
prefilterarticles
rsrctypearticles
creatorcontrib
0Liang, Liming
1Rousseau, Ronald
2Zhong, Zhen
jtitleScientometrics
toplevelpeer_reviewed
delivery
delcategoryRemote Search Resource
fulltextfulltext
addata
aulast
0Liang
1Rousseau
2Zhong
aufirst
0Liming
1Ronald
2Zhen
au
0Liang, Liming
1Rousseau, Ronald
2Zhong, Zhen
atitleNon-English journals and papers in physics and chemistry: bias in citations?
jtitleScientometrics
stitleScientometrics
addtitleAn International Journal for all Quantitative Aspects of the Science of Science, Communication in Science and Science Policy
risdate201304
volume95
issue1
spage333
epage350
issn0138-9130
eissn1588-2861
genrearticle
ristypeJOUR
abstractThis study investigates, at the journal as well as the article level, if there is a difference in citations between English-language and non-English publications. The Web of Knowledge is used as data source. The investigation focuses on the fields of physics and chemistry. Using a precise definition of a “non-English journal”, we filter out nine physics and thirty-four chemistry non-English journals, scattered over six physics and seven chemistry subfields. Average received citations per paper (CpP) of the non-English journal(s) are compared with the CpP of pure English journals, and this in the same subfield. We clearly observe that non-English journals are inferior—in number of citations received—to pure English journals and this in all physics and chemistry subfields studied. Further, twelve physics journals and ten chemistry journals were chosen as sample journals to compare the CpP of non-English papers with that of English language papers in the same journal. The result of this comparison is that for the majority of these journals and for most of the publication years the CpP of non-English papers is lower than that of the English language papers. Finally, analyzing linguistic characteristics of the citing literature confirms the own-language preference in non-English physics and chemistry journals.
copDordrecht
pubSpringer Netherlands
doi10.1007/s11192-012-0828-0
pages333-350
date2013-04