schliessen

Filtern

 

Bibliotheken

吻合器痔上黏膜环切钉合术治疗重度痔的有效性及安全性研究

目的:探讨吻合器痔上黏膜环切钉合术治疗重度痔的有效性及安全性。方法选取本院200例确诊的重度痔患者为研究对象,采用随机数表法分为观察组(吻合器痔上黏膜环切钉合术治疗)和对照组(开放式外剥内扎痔切除术治疗),每组各100例,比较两组患者围术期指标、远期预后及术后并发症发生情况。结果观察组患者手术时间和住院时间均短于对照组(P <0.05),术中出血量少于对照组(P <0.05)。两组患者术后痔脱垂、便血、肛门坠胀、肛门瘙痒的缓解率比较差异均无显著性(P >0.05),观察组患者术后肛门潮湿缓解率显著高于对照组(P <0.05)。观察组患者术后第1天视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分显著低于对照组(P... Full description

Journal Title: 中国医学前沿杂志(电子版) 2016, Vol.8(2), pp.65-67
Main Author: 刘惠敏
Other Authors: 毛国红 , 曾科 , 聂帆
Format: Electronic Article Electronic Article
Language: chi
Subjects:
Quelle: China Online Journals (Wanfang)
ID: ISSN: 1674-7372
Zum Text:
SendSend as email Add to Book BagAdd to Book Bag
Staff View
recordid: wanfang_jourzgyxqyzz201602023
title: 吻合器痔上黏膜环切钉合术治疗重度痔的有效性及安全性研究
format: Article
creator:
  • 刘惠敏
  • 毛国红
  • 曾科
  • 聂帆
subjects:
  • 吻合器痔上黏膜环切钉合术
  • 开放式外剥内扎痔切除术
  • 重度痔
  • Procedure for Prolapse and Hemorrhoids
  • Milligan-Morgan Hemorrhoidectomy
  • Severe Hemorrhoids
ispartof: 中国医学前沿杂志(电子版), 2016, Vol.8(2), pp.65-67
description: 目的:探讨吻合器痔上黏膜环切钉合术治疗重度痔的有效性及安全性。方法选取本院200例确诊的重度痔患者为研究对象,采用随机数表法分为观察组(吻合器痔上黏膜环切钉合术治疗)和对照组(开放式外剥内扎痔切除术治疗),每组各100例,比较两组患者围术期指标、远期预后及术后并发症发生情况。结果观察组患者手术时间和住院时间均短于对照组(P <0.05),术中出血量少于对照组(P <0.05)。两组患者术后痔脱垂、便血、肛门坠胀、肛门瘙痒的缓解率比较差异均无显著性(P >0.05),观察组患者术后肛门潮湿缓解率显著高于对照组(P <0.05)。观察组患者术后第1天视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分显著低于对照组(P <0.05)。两组患者术后并发症发生率比较无显著差异(P >0.05)。结论吻合器痔上黏膜环切钉合术治疗重度痔较开放式外剥内扎痔切除术具有手术时间短、出血量少、疼痛程度轻、住院时间短的优势,临床工作中应根据患者的具体情况选择适合的治疗方式。
language: chi
source: China Online Journals (Wanfang)
identifier: ISSN: 1674-7372
fulltext: no_fulltext
issn:
  • 1674-7372
  • 16747372
url: Link


@attributes
ID1080891261
RANK0.07
NO1
SEARCH_ENGINEprimo_central_multiple_fe
SEARCH_ENGINE_TYPEPrimo Central Search Engine
LOCALfalse
PrimoNMBib
record
control
sourcerecordidzgyxqyzz201602023
sourceidwanfang_jour
recordidTN_wanfang_jourzgyxqyzz201602023
sourcesystemPC
display
typearticle
title吻合器痔上黏膜环切钉合术治疗重度痔的有效性及安全性研究
creator
0刘惠敏 ; 毛国红 ; 曾科 ; 聂帆
1LIU Hui-min ; MAO Guo-hong ; ZENG Ke ; NIE Fan
identifierISSN: 1674-7372
subject吻合器痔上黏膜环切钉合术 ; 开放式外剥内扎痔切除术 ; 重度痔 ; Procedure for Prolapse and Hemorrhoids ; Milligan-Morgan Hemorrhoidectomy ; Severe Hemorrhoids
description
0目的:探讨吻合器痔上黏膜环切钉合术治疗重度痔的有效性及安全性。方法选取本院200例确诊的重度痔患者为研究对象,采用随机数表法分为观察组(吻合器痔上黏膜环切钉合术治疗)和对照组(开放式外剥内扎痔切除术治疗),每组各100例,比较两组患者围术期指标、远期预后及术后并发症发生情况。结果观察组患者手术时间和住院时间均短于对照组(P <0.05),术中出血量少于对照组(P <0.05)。两组患者术后痔脱垂、便血、肛门坠胀、肛门瘙痒的缓解率比较差异均无显著性(P >0.05),观察组患者术后肛门潮湿缓解率显著高于对照组(P <0.05)。观察组患者术后第1天视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分显著低于对照组(P <0.05)。两组患者术后并发症发生率比较无显著差异(P >0.05)。结论吻合器痔上黏膜环切钉合术治疗重度痔较开放式外剥内扎痔切除术具有手术时间短、出血量少、疼痛程度轻、住院时间短的优势,临床工作中应根据患者的具体情况选择适合的治疗方式。
1Objective To explore the efficacy and safety of procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids in the treatment of severe hemorrhoids. Method 200 patients with severe hemorrhoids in our hospital were randomly divided into observation group (procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids therapy) and control group (Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy therapy), 100 patients in each group, the perioperative indicators, long-term prognosis and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. Result The operation time and length of stay in observation group were shorter than control group (P 0.05), the improvement rate of anal moisture in observation group was significantly higher than control group (P 0.05). Conclusion Procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids in the treatment of severe hemorrhoids can shorten surgery time, reduce amount of bleeding, relieve pain, shorter length of stay, clinical work should be based on the specific circumstances of the patient to choose the appropriate treatment.
languagechi
sourceChina Online Journals (Wanfang)
vertitleEfficacy and safety of procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids in the treatment of severe hemorrhoids
ispartof中国医学前沿杂志(电子版), 2016, Vol.8(2), pp.65-67
links
openurl$$Topenurl_article
backlink
0$$Uhttp://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical_zgyxqyzz201602023.aspx$$EView_this record_in_Wanfang_(CHINA)
1$$Uhttp://d.g.wanfangdata.com.hk/Periodical_zgyxqyzz201602023.aspx$$EView_this record_in_Wanfang_(HONG_KONG)
openurlfulltext$$Topenurlfull_article
addlink$$Uhttp://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/aboutWanfang.html$$EView_the_Wanfang_Copyright_Statement
search
creatorcontrib
0刘惠敏
1毛国红
2曾科
3聂帆
4LIU Hui-min
5MAO Guo-hong
6ZENG Ke
7NIE Fan
title吻合器痔上黏膜环切钉合术治疗重度痔的有效性及安全性研究
description
0目的:探讨吻合器痔上黏膜环切钉合术治疗重度痔的有效性及安全性。方法选取本院200例确诊的重度痔患者为研究对象,采用随机数表法分为观察组(吻合器痔上黏膜环切钉合术治疗)和对照组(开放式外剥内扎痔切除术治疗),每组各100例,比较两组患者围术期指标、远期预后及术后并发症发生情况。结果观察组患者手术时间和住院时间均短于对照组(P <0.05),术中出血量少于对照组(P <0.05)。两组患者术后痔脱垂、便血、肛门坠胀、肛门瘙痒的缓解率比较差异均无显著性(P >0.05),观察组患者术后肛门潮湿缓解率显著高于对照组(P <0.05)。观察组患者术后第1天视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分显著低于对照组(P <0.05)。两组患者术后并发症发生率比较无显著差异(P >0.05)。结论吻合器痔上黏膜环切钉合术治疗重度痔较开放式外剥内扎痔切除术具有手术时间短、出血量少、疼痛程度轻、住院时间短的优势,临床工作中应根据患者的具体情况选择适合的治疗方式。
1Objective To explore the efficacy and safety of procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids in the treatment of severe hemorrhoids. Method 200 patients with severe hemorrhoids in our hospital were randomly divided into observation group (procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids therapy) and control group (Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy therapy), 100 patients in each group, the perioperative indicators, long-term prognosis and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. Result The operation time and length of stay in observation group were shorter than control group (P 0.05), the improvement rate of anal moisture in observation group was significantly higher than control group (P 0.05). Conclusion Procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids in the treatment of severe hemorrhoids can shorten surgery time, reduce amount of bleeding, relieve pain, shorter length of stay, clinical work should be based on the specific circumstances of the patient to choose the appropriate treatment.
subject
0吻合器痔上黏膜环切钉合术
1开放式外剥内扎痔切除术
2重度痔
3Procedure for Prolapse and Hemorrhoids
4Milligan-Morgan Hemorrhoidectomy
5Severe Hemorrhoids
general
0Chinese
1China Online Journals (Wanfang)
sourceidwanfang_jour
recordidwanfang_jourzgyxqyzz201602023
issn
01674-7372
116747372
rsrctypearticle
creationdate2016
searchscopewanfang_jour
scopewanfang_jour
alttitleEfficacy and safety of procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids in the treatment of severe hemorrhoids
startdate20160101
enddate20161231
addtitle中国医学前沿杂志(电子版)
citationpf 65 pt 67 vol 8 issue 2
sort
title吻合器痔上黏膜环切钉合术治疗重度痔的有效性及安全性研究
author刘惠敏 ; 毛国红 ; 曾科 ; 聂帆
creationdate20160000
lso0120160000
facets
frbrgroupid8648082701738672996
frbrtype6
newrecords20170928
languagechi
creationdate2016
topic
0吻合器痔上黏膜环切钉合术
1开放式外剥内扎痔切除术
2重度痔
3Procedure for Prolapse and Hemorrhoids
4Milligan-Morgan Hemorrhoidectomy
5Severe Hemorrhoids
collectionChina Online Journals (Wanfang)
prefilterarticles
rsrctypearticles
creatorcontrib
0刘惠敏
1毛国红
2曾科
3聂帆
4LIU Hui-min
5MAO Guo-hong
6ZENG Ke
7NIE Fan
jtitle中国医学前沿杂志(电子版)
delivery
delcategoryRemote Search Resource
fulltextno_fulltext
addata
au
0刘惠敏
1毛国红
2曾科
3聂帆
4LIU Hui-min
5MAO Guo-hong
6ZENG Ke
7NIE Fan
atitle吻合器痔上黏膜环切钉合术治疗重度痔的有效性及安全性研究
jtitle中国医学前沿杂志(电子版)
date2016
risdate2016
volume8
issue2
spage65
epage67
pages65-67
issn1674-7372
formatjournal
genrearticle
ristypeJOUR
abstract
0目的:探讨吻合器痔上黏膜环切钉合术治疗重度痔的有效性及安全性。方法选取本院200例确诊的重度痔患者为研究对象,采用随机数表法分为观察组(吻合器痔上黏膜环切钉合术治疗)和对照组(开放式外剥内扎痔切除术治疗),每组各100例,比较两组患者围术期指标、远期预后及术后并发症发生情况。结果观察组患者手术时间和住院时间均短于对照组(P <0.05),术中出血量少于对照组(P <0.05)。两组患者术后痔脱垂、便血、肛门坠胀、肛门瘙痒的缓解率比较差异均无显著性(P >0.05),观察组患者术后肛门潮湿缓解率显著高于对照组(P <0.05)。观察组患者术后第1天视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分显著低于对照组(P <0.05)。两组患者术后并发症发生率比较无显著差异(P >0.05)。结论吻合器痔上黏膜环切钉合术治疗重度痔较开放式外剥内扎痔切除术具有手术时间短、出血量少、疼痛程度轻、住院时间短的优势,临床工作中应根据患者的具体情况选择适合的治疗方式。
1Objective To explore the efficacy and safety of procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids in the treatment of severe hemorrhoids. Method 200 patients with severe hemorrhoids in our hospital were randomly divided into observation group (procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids therapy) and control group (Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy therapy), 100 patients in each group, the perioperative indicators, long-term prognosis and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. Result The operation time and length of stay in observation group were shorter than control group (P 0.05), the improvement rate of anal moisture in observation group was significantly higher than control group (P 0.05). Conclusion Procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids in the treatment of severe hemorrhoids can shorten surgery time, reduce amount of bleeding, relieve pain, shorter length of stay, clinical work should be based on the specific circumstances of the patient to choose the appropriate treatment.