schliessen

Filtern

 

Bibliotheken

An observational study of health professionals’ use of evidence to inform the development of clinical management tools

This observational study sought to investigate the process of evidence use by health professionals during development of evidence‐based clinical management tools. Studies conducted to explore the process of research use are scarce and knowledge of this process is essential for our understanding of t... Full description

Journal Title: Journal of Clinical Nursing August 2008, Vol.17(16), pp.2203-2211
Main Author: Hutchinson, Alison M
Other Authors: Johnston, Linda
Format: Electronic Article Electronic Article
Language:
Subjects:
ID: ISSN: 0962-1067 ; E-ISSN: 1365-2702 ; DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02384.x
Zum Text:
SendSend as email Add to Book BagAdd to Book Bag
Staff View
recordid: wj10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02384.x
title: An observational study of health professionals’ use of evidence to inform the development of clinical management tools
format: Article
creator:
  • Hutchinson, Alison M
  • Johnston, Linda
subjects:
  • Clinical Management Tool
  • Evidence‐Based Practice
  • Nurses
  • Nursing
  • Observation
  • Research Use
ispartof: Journal of Clinical Nursing, August 2008, Vol.17(16), pp.2203-2211
description: This observational study sought to investigate the process of evidence use by health professionals during development of evidence‐based clinical management tools. Studies conducted to explore the process of research use are scarce and knowledge of this process is essential for our understanding of the influences on research use in practice. A qualitative, non‐participant, observational design. Behaviour and actions of two separate multidisciplinary teams were observed and audio‐recorded during a combined total of seven meetings for the development of clinical management tools. Semi‐structured, one‐to‐one interviews were conducted approximately half‐way through the development process and following completion of the clinical management tools. Three major themes emerged from this research. First, the process of clinical management tool development and evidence use. Nurses assumed responsibility for coordination of development which focused on describing current practice. Second, the forms of evidence employed during the development process included the use of experiential knowledge, opinions and knowledge of the context, in addition to research evidence. However, reference to research evidence was limited and its incorporation into the instrument was infrequently observed. Third, the use of research evidence emerged with respect to how such evidence was employed. This study focused on real‐life discussion and decision‐making that occurred between health professionals when developing evidence‐based clinical management tools. Health professionals may have a tendency to rely on their professional experience and current practice in preference to seeking and applying relevant research evidence. Nurses have an important role to play in the development of multidisciplinary evidence‐based clinical management tools, but to actively participate in this process they need to be familiar with the relevant research evidence and have the skills and confidence to integrate the evidence into practice.
language:
source:
identifier: ISSN: 0962-1067 ; E-ISSN: 1365-2702 ; DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02384.x
fulltext: fulltext
issn:
  • 0962-1067
  • 09621067
  • 1365-2702
  • 13652702
url: Link


@attributes
ID1183726180
RANK0.06999999
NO1
SEARCH_ENGINEprimo_central_multiple_fe
SEARCH_ENGINE_TYPEPrimo Central Search Engine
LOCALfalse
PrimoNMBib
record
control
sourcerecordid10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02384.x
sourceidwj
recordidTN_wj10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02384.x
sourcesystemPC
pqid764367164
galeid181329045
display
typearticle
titleAn observational study of health professionals’ use of evidence to inform the development of clinical management tools
creatorHutchinson, Alison M ; Johnston, Linda
ispartofJournal of Clinical Nursing, August 2008, Vol.17(16), pp.2203-2211
identifier
subjectClinical Management Tool ; Evidence‐Based Practice ; Nurses ; Nursing ; Observation ; Research Use
descriptionThis observational study sought to investigate the process of evidence use by health professionals during development of evidence‐based clinical management tools. Studies conducted to explore the process of research use are scarce and knowledge of this process is essential for our understanding of the influences on research use in practice. A qualitative, non‐participant, observational design. Behaviour and actions of two separate multidisciplinary teams were observed and audio‐recorded during a combined total of seven meetings for the development of clinical management tools. Semi‐structured, one‐to‐one interviews were conducted approximately half‐way through the development process and following completion of the clinical management tools. Three major themes emerged from this research. First, the process of clinical management tool development and evidence use. Nurses assumed responsibility for coordination of development which focused on describing current practice. Second, the forms of evidence employed during the development process included the use of experiential knowledge, opinions and knowledge of the context, in addition to research evidence. However, reference to research evidence was limited and its incorporation into the instrument was infrequently observed. Third, the use of research evidence emerged with respect to how such evidence was employed. This study focused on real‐life discussion and decision‐making that occurred between health professionals when developing evidence‐based clinical management tools. Health professionals may have a tendency to rely on their professional experience and current practice in preference to seeking and applying relevant research evidence. Nurses have an important role to play in the development of multidisciplinary evidence‐based clinical management tools, but to actively participate in this process they need to be familiar with the relevant research evidence and have the skills and confidence to integrate the evidence into practice.
source
version8
lds50peer_reviewed
links
openurl$$Topenurl_article
openurlfulltext$$Topenurlfull_article
search
creatorcontrib
0Hutchinson, Alison M
1Johnston, Linda
titleAn observational study of health professionals’ use of evidence to inform the development of clinical management tools
descriptionThis observational study sought to investigate the process of evidence use by health professionals during development of evidence‐based clinical management tools. Studies conducted to explore the process of research use are scarce and knowledge of this process is essential for our understanding of the influences on research use in practice. A qualitative, non‐participant, observational design. Behaviour and actions of two separate multidisciplinary teams were observed and audio‐recorded during a combined total of seven meetings for the development of clinical management tools. Semi‐structured, one‐to‐one interviews were conducted approximately half‐way through the development process and following completion of the clinical management tools. Three major themes emerged from this research. First, the process of clinical management tool development and evidence use. Nurses assumed responsibility for coordination of development which focused on describing current practice. Second, the forms of evidence employed during the development process included the use of experiential knowledge, opinions and knowledge of the context, in addition to research evidence. However, reference to research evidence was limited and its incorporation into the instrument was infrequently observed. Third, the use of research evidence emerged with respect to how such evidence was employed. This study focused on real‐life discussion and decision‐making that occurred between health professionals when developing evidence‐based clinical management tools. Health professionals may have a tendency to rely on their professional experience and current practice in preference to seeking and applying relevant research evidence. Nurses have an important role to play in the development of multidisciplinary evidence‐based clinical management tools, but to actively participate in this process they need to be familiar with the relevant research evidence and have the skills and confidence to integrate the evidence into practice.
subject
0Clinical Management Tool
1Evidence‐Based Practice
2Nurses
3Nursing
4Observation
5Research Use
general
0Blackwell Publishing Ltd
110.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02384.x
2Wiley Online Library
sourceidwj
recordidwj10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02384.x
issn
00962-1067
109621067
21365-2702
313652702
rsrctypearticle
creationdate2008
addtitleJournal of Clinical Nursing
searchscope
0wj
1wiley
scope
0wj
1wiley
lsr30VSR-Enriched:[galeid, pqid, pages]
sort
titleAn observational study of health professionals’ use of evidence to inform the development of clinical management tools
authorHutchinson, Alison M ; Johnston, Linda
creationdate20080800
facets
frbrgroupid8509882237920911360
frbrtype5
creationdate2008
topic
0Clinical Management Tool
1Evidence‐Based Practice
2Nurses
3Nursing
4Observation
5Research Use
collectionWiley Online Library
prefilterarticles
rsrctypearticles
creatorcontrib
0Hutchinson, Alison M
1Johnston, Linda
jtitleJournal of Clinical Nursing
toplevelpeer_reviewed
delivery
delcategoryRemote Search Resource
fulltextfulltext
addata
aulast
0Hutchinson
1Johnston
aufirst
0Alison M
1Linda
au
0Hutchinson, Alison M
1Johnston, Linda
atitleAn observational study of health professionals’ use of evidence to inform the development of clinical management tools
jtitleJournal of Clinical Nursing
risdate200808
volume17
issue16
spage2203
epage2211
issn0962-1067
eissn1365-2702
genrearticle
ristypeJOUR
abstractThis observational study sought to investigate the process of evidence use by health professionals during development of evidence‐based clinical management tools. Studies conducted to explore the process of research use are scarce and knowledge of this process is essential for our understanding of the influences on research use in practice. A qualitative, non‐participant, observational design. Behaviour and actions of two separate multidisciplinary teams were observed and audio‐recorded during a combined total of seven meetings for the development of clinical management tools. Semi‐structured, one‐to‐one interviews were conducted approximately half‐way through the development process and following completion of the clinical management tools. Three major themes emerged from this research. First, the process of clinical management tool development and evidence use. Nurses assumed responsibility for coordination of development which focused on describing current practice. Second, the forms of evidence employed during the development process included the use of experiential knowledge, opinions and knowledge of the context, in addition to research evidence. However, reference to research evidence was limited and its incorporation into the instrument was infrequently observed. Third, the use of research evidence emerged with respect to how such evidence was employed. This study focused on real‐life discussion and decision‐making that occurred between health professionals when developing evidence‐based clinical management tools. Health professionals may have a tendency to rely on their professional experience and current practice in preference to seeking and applying relevant research evidence. Nurses have an important role to play in the development of multidisciplinary evidence‐based clinical management tools, but to actively participate in this process they need to be familiar with the relevant research evidence and have the skills and confidence to integrate the evidence into practice.
copOxford, UK
pubBlackwell Publishing Ltd
doi10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02384.x
pages2203-2211
date2008-08